Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCWX vs RERHX
BGCWX vs RERHX Comparison
Open Charts BGCWX vs RERHX
Baillie Gifford EAFE Plus All Cap 2
Price$15.77
Change-$0.12 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets253.3M
American Funds EUPAC R5E
Price$60.02
Change-$0.46 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.64B
BGCWX vs RERHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGCWX vs. RERHX commentary
Jul 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGCWX is a StrongBuy and RERHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERHX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. BGCWX (253M). BGCWX pays higher dividends than RERHX: BGCWX (3.65) vs RERHX (0.85). BGCWX was incepted earlier than RERHX: BGCWX (16 years) vs RERHX (10 years). BGCWX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RERHX (0.62). RERHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BGCWX (23.00). RERHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCWX: RERHX (250) vs BGCWX (25000000). BGCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.20 vs. RERHX (3.08). RERHX return over 5 years is better than : 14.21 vs. BGCWX (-2.29).
| BGCWX | RERHX | BGCWX / RERHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.62 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.62 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.340 | 12.714 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000000 | 250 | 10,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 253M | 134B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.65 | 0.85 | 430% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.20 | 3.08 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.14 | 32.27 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.29 | 14.21 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement