Ad is loading...
BGCWX vs RERHX
BGCWX vs RERHX Comparison
Open Charts BGCWX vs RERHX
Baillie Gifford EAFE Plus All Cap 2
Price$14.17
Change-$0.33 (-2.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets246.54M
American Funds Europacific Growth R5E
Price$53.63
Change-$1.55 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets125.35B
BGCWX vs RERHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGCWX vs. RERHX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGCWX is a Hold and RERHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERHX has more cash in the bank: 125B vs. BGCWX (247M). BGCWX pays higher dividends than RERHX: BGCWX (4.00) vs RERHX (1.35). BGCWX was incepted earlier than RERHX: BGCWX (15 years) vs RERHX (9 years). BGCWX (0.63) and RERHX (0.62) have similar cost to investors . RERHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BGCWX (16.00). RERHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCWX: RERHX (250) vs BGCWX (25000000). BGCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.68 vs. RERHX (-6.68). RERHX return over 5 years is better than : 37.55 vs. BGCWX (19.01).
| BGCWX | RERHX | BGCWX / RERHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.62 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.62 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.924 | 0.714 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000000 | 250 | 10,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 247M | 125B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.00 | 1.35 | 297% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.68 | -6.68 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.48 | -4.03 | 260% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.01 | 37.55 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...