Ad is loading...
BGCWX vs RERHX
BGCWX vs RERHX Comparison
Open Charts BGCWX vs RERHX
Baillie Gifford EAFE Plus All Cap 2
Price$15.08
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.6M
American Funds Europacific Growth R5E
Price$57.12
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.01B
BGCWX vs RERHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGCWX vs. RERHX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGCWX is a Buy and RERHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERHX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. BGCWX (256M). BGCWX pays higher dividends than RERHX: BGCWX (3.88) vs RERHX (1.31). BGCWX was incepted earlier than RERHX: BGCWX (15 years) vs RERHX (9 years). BGCWX (0.63) and RERHX (0.62) have similar cost to investors . RERHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BGCWX (23.00). RERHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCWX: RERHX (250) vs BGCWX (25000000). BGCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.63 vs. RERHX (-0.53). RERHX return over 5 years is better than : 26.81 vs. BGCWX (8.78).
| BGCWX | RERHX | BGCWX / RERHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.62 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.62 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.249 | 7.268 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000000 | 250 | 10,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 256M | 128B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.88 | 1.31 | 296% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.63 | -0.53 | -689% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.78 | 21.22 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.78 | 26.81 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...