Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGEKX vs RERHX
BGEKX vs RERHX Comparison
Open Charts BGEKX vs RERHX
Baillie Gifford International Growth K
Price$14.16
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.34B
American Funds EUPAC R5E
Price$60.37
Change+$0.19 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.45B
BGEKX vs RERHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BGEKX vs. RERHX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGEKX is a Buy and RERHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERHX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. BGEKX (3.34B). RERHX pays higher dividends than BGEKX: RERHX (1.24) vs BGEKX (0.28). BGEKX was incepted earlier than RERHX: BGEKX (8 years) vs RERHX (10 years). RERHX (0.62) is less costly to investors than BGEKX (0.57). RERHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BGEKX (22.00). RERHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGEKX: RERHX (250) vs BGEKX (10000000). BGEKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.13 vs. RERHX (3.04). RERHX return over 5 years is better than : 19.49 vs. BGEKX (-11.55).
| BGEKX | RERHX | BGEKX / RERHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.62 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.62 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.280 | 13.371 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.34B | 133B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 1.24 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.13 | 3.04 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.92 | 17.47 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.55 | 19.49 | -59% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement