BGUUF
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.02 (+66.67%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
FNMCF
Price
$0.24
Change
-$0.01 (-4.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

BGUUF vs FNMCF

Header iconBGUUF vs FNMCF Comparison
Open Charts BGUUF vs FNMCFBanner chart's image
Benguet Corp. BC
Price$0.05
Change+$0.02 (+66.67%)
Volume$3K
CapitalizationN/A
FIRST NORDIC METALS
Price$0.24
Change-$0.01 (-4.00%)
Volume$132.8K
CapitalizationN/A
BGUUF vs FNMCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BGUUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BGUUF vs. FNMCF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGUUF is a Hold and FNMCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BGUUF: $0.05 vs. FNMCF: $0.24)
Brand notoriety: BGUUF and FNMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGUUF: 149% vs. FNMCF: 196%
Market capitalization -- BGUUF: $53.39M vs. FNMCF: $0
BGUUF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $53.39M. FNMCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGUUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFNMCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BGUUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FNMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BGUUF is a better buy in the long-term than FNMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGUUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNMCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGUUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FNMCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BGUUF and FNMCF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BGUUF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FNMCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -2.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNMCF YTD gains are higher at: 109.932 vs. BGUUF (-16.667).
BGUUFFNMCFBGUUF / FNMCF
Capitalization53.4MN/A-
EBITDA1.81BN/A-
Gain YTD-16.667109.932-15%
P/E Ratio1.82N/A-
Revenue3.72BN/A-
Total Cash2.55BN/A-
Total Debt348MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BGUUF vs FNMCF: Fundamental Ratings
BGUUF
FNMCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3866
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
71100
SMR RATING
1..100
8298
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BGUUF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNMCF (73). This means that BGUUF’s stock grew significantly faster than FNMCF’s over the last 12 months.

BGUUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as FNMCF (100). This means that BGUUF’s stock grew similarly to FNMCF’s over the last 12 months.

BGUUF's SMR Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as FNMCF (98). This means that BGUUF’s stock grew similarly to FNMCF’s over the last 12 months.

FNMCF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as BGUUF (49). This means that FNMCF’s stock grew similarly to BGUUF’s over the last 12 months.

BGUUF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNMCF (100). This means that BGUUF’s stock grew significantly faster than FNMCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGUUFFNMCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BGUUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ATOM.X8.525104-0.366426
-4.12%
Cosmos cryptocurrency
STRAX.X0.061755-0.002937
-4.54%
Stratis [New] cryptocurrency
SC.X0.006267-0.000370
-5.58%
Siacoin cryptocurrency
LOKA.X0.265387-0.017608
-6.22%
League of Kingdoms Arena cryptocurrency
BTCST.X0.093236-0.020465
-18.00%
Bitcoin Standard Hashrate Token cryptocurrency

BGUUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGUUF has been loosely correlated with GSRCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGUUF jumps, then GSRCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGUUF
1D Price
Change %
BGUUF100%
N/A
GSRCF - BGUUF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FNMCF - BGUUF
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
BKRRF - BGUUF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
BRGC - BGUUF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.74%
BMXI - BGUUF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
More

FNMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNMCF and FFMGF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNMCF and FFMGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNMCF
1D Price
Change %
FNMCF100%
-1.04%
FFMGF - FNMCF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
EGO - FNMCF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
PPTA - FNMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
ORFDF - FNMCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
KSSRF - FNMCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More