BH
Price
$204.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
BLMN
Price
$13.55
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
91 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BH vs BLMN

Header iconBH vs BLMN Comparison
Open Charts BH vs BLMNBanner chart's image
Biglari Holdings
Price$204.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$14.63K
CapitalizationN/A
Bloomin' Brands
Price$13.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.44M
CapitalizationN/A
BH vs BLMN Comparison Chart
Loading...
BH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
BLMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BH vs. BLMN commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BH is a Buy and BLMN is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (BH: $204.00 vs. BLMN: $13.55)
Brand notoriety: BH and BLMN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BH: 532% vs. BLMN: 150%
Market capitalization -- BH: $632.38M vs. BLMN: $1.15B
BH [@Restaurants] is valued at $632.38M. BLMN’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $213.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBLMN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BLMN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BH is a better buy in the long-term than BLMN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BLMN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BLMN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLMN is a better buy in the short-term than BH.

Price Growth

BH (@Restaurants) experienced а +13.35% price change this week, while BLMN (@Restaurants) price change was -20.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

BH is expected to report earnings on Nov 08, 2024.

BLMN is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.26% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLMN($1.14B) has a higher market cap than BH($657M). BLMN has higher P/E ratio than BH: BLMN (52.24) vs BH (5.99). BH YTD gains are higher at: 23.689 vs. BLMN (-50.302). BLMN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 299M vs. BH (-13.04M). BH (121M) and BLMN (118M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . BH has less debt than BLMN: BH (107M) vs BLMN (2.31B). BLMN has higher revenues than BH: BLMN (4.59B) vs BH (362M).
BHBLMNBH / BLMN
Capitalization657M1.14B58%
EBITDA-13.04M299M-4%
Gain YTD23.689-50.302-47%
P/E Ratio5.9952.2411%
Revenue362M4.59B8%
Total Cash121M118M103%
Total Debt107M2.31B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BH vs BLMN: Fundamental Ratings
BH
BLMN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2865
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20100
SMR RATING
1..100
9069
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4988
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
942
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLMN's Valuation (8) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BH (50). This means that BLMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BH’s over the last 12 months.

BH's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for BLMN (100). This means that BH’s stock grew significantly faster than BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

BLMN's SMR Rating (69) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BH (90). This means that BLMN’s stock grew similarly to BH’s over the last 12 months.

BH's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLMN (88). This means that BH’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

BLMN's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for BH (94). This means that BLMN’s stock grew significantly faster than BH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHBLMN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
BLMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGLKX17.310.01
+0.06%
MFS Global Real Estate R2
GCEPX8.72N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income P
SFEPX25.13-0.03
-0.12%
NAA Large Core P
FBSRX39.43-0.05
-0.13%
Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value R
IGAAX36.70-0.28
-0.76%
American Funds Intl Gr and Inc A

BH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BH has been loosely correlated with DIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BH jumps, then DIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BH
1D Price
Change %
BH100%
+9.98%
DIN - BH
35%
Loosely correlated
+3.38%
CAKE - BH
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
RICK - BH
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.68%
BLMN - BH
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
CNNE - BH
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.82%
More

BLMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLMN has been loosely correlated with DIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLMN jumps, then DIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLMN
1D Price
Change %
BLMN100%
+1.50%
DIN - BLMN
63%
Loosely correlated
+3.38%
CBRL - BLMN
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
DENN - BLMN
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
DRI - BLMN
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.56%
CAKE - BLMN
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
More