Advertisement
BHE vs GT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHE is a Hold and GT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BHE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BHE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BHE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BHE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- GT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
BHE (@Electronic Components) experienced а -2.34% price change this week, while GT (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +0.82% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.48%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.82%.
Reported Earning Dates
BHE is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
GT is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (+0.88% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.74% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
| BHE | GT | BHE / GT | |
| Capitalization | 1.31B | 3.9B | 34% |
| EBITDA | 144M | 856M | 17% |
| Gain YTD | -19.759 | 23.667 | -83% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.19 | 769.23 | 3% |
| Revenue | 2.61B | 20.1B | 13% |
| Total Cash | 355M | 902M | 39% |
| Total Debt | 382M | 8.65B | 4% |
BHE | GT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 78 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | 82 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 10 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BHE's Valuation (16) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GT (58) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that BHE’s stock grew somewhat faster than GT’s over the last 12 months.
BHE's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GT (78) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that BHE’s stock grew somewhat faster than GT’s over the last 12 months.
GT's SMR Rating (82) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as BHE (83) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that GT’s stock grew similarly to BHE’s over the last 12 months.
GT's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as BHE (61) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that GT’s stock grew similarly to BHE’s over the last 12 months.
BHE's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GT (98) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that BHE’s stock grew somewhat faster than GT’s over the last 12 months.
| BHE | GT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 65% | 11 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 5 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 65% |
Advertisement
BHE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHE has been closely correlated with SANM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BHE jumps, then SANM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BHE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHE | 100% | -0.33% | ||
| SANM - BHE | 75% Closely correlated | +2.85% | ||
| PLXS - BHE | 73% Closely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| KN - BHE | 70% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| FLEX - BHE | 68% Closely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| BELFB - BHE | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
More | ||||
GT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GT has been loosely correlated with AXL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GT jumps, then AXL could also see price increases.