BHFAM
Price
$14.34
Change
-$0.16 (-1.10%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
GL
Price
$119.79
Change
-$0.98 (-0.81%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
10.73B
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHFAM vs GL

Header iconBHFAM vs GL Comparison
Open Charts BHFAM vs GLBanner chart's image
Brighthouse Financial
Price$14.34
Change-$0.16 (-1.10%)
Volume$5.49K
CapitalizationN/A
Globe Life
Price$119.79
Change-$0.98 (-0.81%)
Volume$485.39K
Capitalization10.73B
BHFAM vs GL Comparison Chart
Loading...
BHFAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHFAM vs. GL commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHFAM is a StrongBuy and GL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (BHFAM: $14.34 vs. GL: $119.79)
Brand notoriety: BHFAM and GL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHFAM: 17% vs. GL: 81%
Market capitalization -- BHFAM: $0 vs. GL: $10.73B
BHFAM [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $0. GL’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $10.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHFAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BHFAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GL is a better buy in the long-term than BHFAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHFAM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GL’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHFAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GL is a better buy in the short-term than BHFAM.

Price Growth

BHFAM (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -4.98% price change this week, while GL (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -1.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

GL is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-0.92% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GL YTD gains are higher at: 7.866 vs. BHFAM (-7.541). BHFAM has more cash in the bank: 86B vs. GL (18.1B). GL has less debt than BHFAM: GL (2.12B) vs BHFAM (3.16B). GL has higher revenues than BHFAM: GL (5.45B) vs BHFAM (3.95B).
BHFAMGLBHFAM / GL
CapitalizationN/A10.7B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.5417.866-96%
P/E RatioN/A11.33-
Revenue3.95B5.45B73%
Total Cash86B18.1B475%
Total Debt3.16B2.12B149%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GL: Fundamental Ratings
GL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
85
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
54
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
22
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHFAMGL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHFAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IGOV42.29-0.30
-0.70%
iShares International Treasury Bond ETF
RFMZ12.56-0.11
-0.86%
RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund II
ONOF33.14-0.38
-1.12%
Global X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF
ACWI125.39-1.46
-1.15%
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
CCSO21.86-0.34
-1.53%
Carbon Collective Climate Sol US Eq ETF

BHFAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHFAM has been closely correlated with BHFAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BHFAM jumps, then BHFAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHFAM
1D Price
Change %
BHFAM100%
-1.10%
BHFAN - BHFAM
82%
Closely correlated
-1.39%
BHFAP - BHFAM
75%
Closely correlated
-0.05%
BHFAO - BHFAM
72%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
BHF - BHFAM
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.91%
GL - BHFAM
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
More

GL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GL has been closely correlated with CNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GL jumps, then CNO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GL
1D Price
Change %
GL100%
-0.81%
CNO - GL
72%
Closely correlated
-2.07%
MET - GL
71%
Closely correlated
-2.08%
PRU - GL
71%
Closely correlated
-1.84%
UNM - GL
71%
Closely correlated
-1.34%
GNW - GL
70%
Closely correlated
-1.56%
More