BHLB
Price
$26.21
Change
-$0.22 (-0.83%)
Updated
Jul 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
970.64M
Earnings call today
PFS
Price
$18.28
Change
-$0.03 (-0.16%)
Updated
Jul 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.1B
One day until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHLB vs PFS

Header iconBHLB vs PFS Comparison
Open Charts BHLB vs PFSBanner chart's image
Berkshire Hills Ban
Price$26.21
Change-$0.22 (-0.83%)
Volume$3.6K
Capitalization970.64M
Provident Financial Services
Price$18.28
Change-$0.03 (-0.16%)
Volume$4.61K
Capitalization1.1B
BHLB vs PFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BHLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHLB vs. PFS commentary
Jul 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHLB is a Hold and PFS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 24, 2025
Stock price -- (BHLB: $26.23 vs. PFS: $18.27)
Brand notoriety: BHLB and PFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHLB: 105% vs. PFS: 81%
Market capitalization -- BHLB: $970.64M vs. PFS: $1.1B
BHLB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $970.64M. PFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHLB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BHLB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the long-term than BHLB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHLB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHLB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • PFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BHLB and PFS are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BHLB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.34% price change this week, while PFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHLB is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

PFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.63% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFS($1.1B) has a higher market cap than BHLB($971M). BHLB has higher P/E ratio than PFS: BHLB (13.91) vs PFS (8.49). PFS YTD gains are higher at: 0.107 vs. BHLB (-6.533). PFS has more cash in the bank: 189M vs. BHLB (121M). BHLB has less debt than PFS: BHLB (568M) vs PFS (1.46B). PFS has higher revenues than BHLB: PFS (479M) vs BHLB (412M).
BHLBPFSBHLB / PFS
Capitalization971M1.1B89%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-6.5330.107-6,129%
P/E Ratio13.918.49164%
Revenue412M479M86%
Total Cash121M189M64%
Total Debt568M1.46B39%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHLB vs PFS: Fundamental Ratings
BHLB
PFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1014
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3047
SMR RATING
1..100
1512
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5247
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9917
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5044

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFS's Valuation (37) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BHLB (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to BHLB’s over the last 12 months.

BHLB's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (47) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BHLB’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's SMR Rating (12) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BHLB (15) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to BHLB’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BHLB (52) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to BHLB’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BHLB (99) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew significantly faster than BHLB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHLBPFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WMICX7.940.17
+2.19%
Wasatch Micro Cap
FIGFX22.59N/A
N/A
Fidelity International Growth
MRBPX23.27N/A
N/A
BlackRock Balanced R
RHJSX21.76N/A
N/A
Rice Hall James Micro Cap Instl
OSTVX17.07N/A
N/A
Osterweis Growth & Income Fund