BHLL
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
31.51M
KGC
Price
$15.06
Change
+$0.29 (+1.96%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
7.52B
79 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BHLL vs KGC

Header iconBHLL vs KGC Comparison
Open Charts BHLL vs KGCBanner chart's image
Bunker Hill Mining
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$212.41K
Capitalization31.51M
Kinross Gold
Price$15.06
Change+$0.29 (+1.96%)
Volume$19.49M
Capitalization7.52B
BHLL vs KGC Comparison Chart
Loading...
BHLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHLL vs. KGC commentary
May 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHLL is a Hold and KGC is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 12, 2025
Stock price -- (BHLL: $0.11 vs. KGC: $15.06)
Brand notoriety: BHLL: Not notable vs. KGC: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHLL: 61% vs. KGC: 93%
Market capitalization -- BHLL: $31.51M vs. KGC: $7.52B
BHLL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $31.51M. KGC’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $7.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHLL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKGC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BHLL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KGC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KGC is a better buy in the long-term than BHLL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHLL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KGC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHLL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KGC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BHLL and KGC are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BHLL (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.85% price change this week, while KGC (@Precious Metals) price change was +7.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHLL is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.

KGC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.13% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGC($7.52B) has a higher market cap than BHLL($31.5M). KGC has higher P/E ratio than BHLL: KGC (18.12) vs BHLL (3.52). KGC YTD gains are higher at: 62.899 vs. BHLL (-6.133). KGC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.76B vs. BHLL (-14.68M). KGC has more cash in the bank: 352M vs. BHLL (35.1M). BHLL has less debt than KGC: BHLL (66.8M) vs KGC (2.26B). KGC has higher revenues than BHLL: KGC (4.24B) vs BHLL (0).
BHLLKGCBHLL / KGC
Capitalization31.5M7.52B0%
EBITDA-14.68M1.76B-1%
Gain YTD-6.13362.899-10%
P/E Ratio3.5218.1219%
Revenue04.24B-
Total Cash35.1M352M10%
Total Debt66.8M2.26B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHLL vs KGC: Fundamental Ratings
BHLL
KGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5791
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10024
SMR RATING
1..100
10062
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10079
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KGC's Valuation (18) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as BHLL (24) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to BHLL’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for BHLL (100) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew significantly faster than BHLL’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's SMR Rating (62) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHLL (100) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHLL’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as BHLL (50) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to BHLL’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as BHLL (100) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to BHLL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHLLKGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BHLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SLVP15.810.79
+5.26%
iShares MSCI Global Silver&Mtls Mnrs ETF
LIT37.670.24
+0.64%
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
KONG28.52N/A
N/A
Formidable Fortress ETF
BLV67.82-0.03
-0.04%
Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF
HUSV39.50-0.09
-0.23%
First Trust Hrzn MgdVolatil Domestic ETF

BHLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BHLL and GFI have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BHLL and GFI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHLL
1D Price
Change %
BHLL100%
+0.38%
GFI - BHLL
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
NGD - BHLL
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.98%
SAND - BHLL
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.28%
KGC - BHLL
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
LUGDF - BHLL
26%
Poorly correlated
+13.47%
More