BHLL
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
31.51M
LUGDF
Price
$52.72
Change
+$3.61 (+7.35%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
3.16B
37 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHLL vs LUGDF

Header iconBHLL vs LUGDF Comparison
Open Charts BHLL vs LUGDFBanner chart's image
Bunker Hill Mining
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$208.83K
Capitalization31.51M
Lundin Gold
Price$52.72
Change+$3.61 (+7.35%)
Volume$31.51K
Capitalization3.16B
BHLL vs LUGDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BHLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHLL vs. LUGDF commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHLL is a Hold and LUGDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (BHLL: $0.09 vs. LUGDF: $52.72)
Brand notoriety: BHLL and LUGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHLL: 125% vs. LUGDF: 63%
Market capitalization -- BHLL: $31.51M vs. LUGDF: $3.16B
BHLL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $31.51M. LUGDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHLL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLUGDF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BHLL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LUGDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUGDF is a better buy in the long-term than BHLL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHLL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LUGDF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHLL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • LUGDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LUGDF is a better buy in the short-term than BHLL.

Price Growth

BHLL (@Precious Metals) experienced а -7.75% price change this week, while LUGDF (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHLL is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

LUGDF is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-0.13% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LUGDF($3.16B) has a higher market cap than BHLL($31.5M). LUGDF has higher P/E ratio than BHLL: LUGDF (30.67) vs BHLL (3.52). LUGDF YTD gains are higher at: 154.593 vs. BHLL (-23.902). LUGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 387M vs. BHLL (-14.68M). LUGDF has more cash in the bank: 210M vs. BHLL (35.1M). BHLL has less debt than LUGDF: BHLL (66.8M) vs LUGDF (430M). LUGDF has higher revenues than BHLL: LUGDF (856M) vs BHLL (0).
BHLLLUGDFBHLL / LUGDF
Capitalization31.5M3.16B1%
EBITDA-14.68M387M-4%
Gain YTD-23.902154.593-15%
P/E Ratio3.5230.6711%
Revenue0856M-
Total Cash35.1M210M17%
Total Debt66.8M430M16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHLL vs LUGDF: Fundamental Ratings
BHLL
LUGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5765
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1002
SMR RATING
1..100
10020
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8435
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10043
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LUGDF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as BHLL (24). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew similarly to BHLL’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BHLL (100). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than BHLL’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BHLL (100). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than BHLL’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHLL (84). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHLL’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHLL (100). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHLL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHLLLUGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FBTTX23.71N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology M
FERIX57.31N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia I
WILCX10.46N/A
N/A
Wasatch Global Value Institutional
ASVHX9.86N/A
N/A
American Century Small Cap Value G
PISYX11.94N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Intrinsic Value Y

BHLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BHLL and GFI have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BHLL and GFI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHLL
1D Price
Change %
BHLL100%
-4.88%
GFI - BHLL
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.50%
NGD - BHLL
27%
Poorly correlated
+4.21%
SAND - BHLL
27%
Poorly correlated
+4.10%
KGC - BHLL
26%
Poorly correlated
+5.11%
LUGDF - BHLL
26%
Poorly correlated
+7.35%
More

LUGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUGDF has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LUGDF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUGDF
1D Price
Change %
LUGDF100%
+7.35%
AEM - LUGDF
70%
Closely correlated
+2.42%
PAAS - LUGDF
68%
Closely correlated
+2.45%
TORXF - LUGDF
66%
Closely correlated
+5.82%
KGC - LUGDF
66%
Closely correlated
+5.11%
AGI - LUGDF
64%
Loosely correlated
+3.79%
More