BHM
Price
$13.50
Change
-$0.21 (-1.53%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
65.45M
CTO
Price
$17.65
Change
+$0.03 (+0.17%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
386.61M
3 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHM vs CTO

Header iconBHM vs CTO Comparison
Open Charts BHM vs CTOBanner chart's image
Bluerock Homes Trust
Price$13.50
Change-$0.21 (-1.53%)
Volume$2.15K
Capitalization65.45M
CTO Realty Growth
Price$17.65
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
Volume$137.14K
Capitalization386.61M
BHM vs CTO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BHM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CTO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHM vs. CTO commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHM is a Hold and CTO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BHM: $13.50 vs. CTO: $17.65)
Brand notoriety: BHM and CTO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHM: 71% vs. CTO: 46%
Market capitalization -- BHM: $65.45M vs. CTO: $386.61M
BHM [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $65.45M. CTO’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $386.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCTO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BHM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CTO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTO is a better buy in the long-term than BHM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CTO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CTO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTO is a better buy in the short-term than BHM.

Price Growth

BHM (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -4.19% price change this week, while CTO (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +2.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHM is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

CTO is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.91% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTO($387M) has a higher market cap than BHM($65.5M). BHM YTD gains are higher at: 3.814 vs. CTO (-6.728). CTO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 71.7M vs. BHM (16.6M). BHM has more cash in the bank: 80.2M vs. CTO (49.7M). BHM has less debt than CTO: BHM (167M) vs CTO (506M). CTO has higher revenues than BHM: CTO (109M) vs BHM (41.1M).
BHMCTOBHM / CTO
Capitalization65.5M387M17%
EBITDA16.6M71.7M23%
Gain YTD3.814-6.728-57%
P/E RatioN/A566.67-
Revenue41.1M109M38%
Total Cash80.2M49.7M161%
Total Debt167M506M33%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTO: Fundamental Ratings
CTO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
67
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
14
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHMCTO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CTO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMGKF24.59N/A
N/A
Smiths Group Plc
TYFG45.00N/A
N/A
Tri County Financial Group Inc.
UHOIF12.51N/A
N/A
Ushio Inc.
ALIZY40.21-0.23
-0.57%
Allianz SE
CANN0.03N/A
-8.55%
TREES Corporation

BHM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BHM and WSR have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BHM and WSR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHM
1D Price
Change %
BHM100%
-1.53%
WSR - BHM
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
CTO - BHM
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
IRM - BHM
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
FRT - BHM
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
EPR - BHM
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
More