BHPLF
Price
$20.51
Change
-$2.50 (-10.86%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
156.31B
CSCCF
Price
$4.04
Change
-$0.56 (-12.17%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
3.61B
26 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BHPLF vs CSCCF

Header iconBHPLF vs CSCCF Comparison
Open Charts BHPLF vs CSCCFBanner chart's image
BHP Group
Price$20.51
Change-$2.50 (-10.86%)
Volume$13.98K
Capitalization156.31B
CAPSTONE COPPER
Price$4.04
Change-$0.56 (-12.17%)
Volume$709.98K
Capitalization3.61B
BHPLF vs CSCCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BHPLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHPLF vs. CSCCF commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHPLF is a Hold and CSCCF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BHPLF: $23.01 vs. CSCCF: $4.60)
Brand notoriety: BHPLF and CSCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHPLF: 37% vs. CSCCF: 302%
Market capitalization -- BHPLF: $156.31B vs. CSCCF: $3.61B
BHPLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $156.31B. CSCCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $3.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHPLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCSCCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BHPLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CSCCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BHPLF is a better buy in the long-term than CSCCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHPLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSCCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHPLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • CSCCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSCCF is a better buy in the short-term than BHPLF.

Price Growth

BHPLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.48% price change this week, while CSCCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -18.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -2.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSCCF is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-2.65% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHPLF($156B) has a higher market cap than CSCCF($3.61B). CSCCF has higher P/E ratio than BHPLF: CSCCF (62.89) vs BHPLF (8.64). BHPLF YTD gains are higher at: -3.137 vs. CSCCF (-25.337). BHPLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 35.8B vs. CSCCF (311M). BHPLF has more cash in the bank: 10.1B vs. CSCCF (101M). CSCCF has less debt than BHPLF: CSCCF (801M) vs BHPLF (14.7B). BHPLF has higher revenues than CSCCF: BHPLF (60.3B) vs CSCCF (1.36B).
BHPLFCSCCFBHPLF / CSCCF
Capitalization156B3.61B4,324%
EBITDA35.8B311M11,511%
Gain YTD-3.137-25.33712%
P/E Ratio8.6462.8914%
Revenue60.3B1.36B4,421%
Total Cash10.1B101M10,000%
Total Debt14.7B801M1,835%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHPLF: Fundamental Ratings
BHPLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
51
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHPLFCSCCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BHPLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TMF45.700.65
+1.44%
Direxion Daily 20+ Yr Trsy Bull 3X ETF
FLGB28.54-0.21
-0.73%
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF
FLV68.20-1.15
-1.66%
American Century Foc Lrg Cp Val ETF
PST22.13-0.60
-2.66%
ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury
KOCT28.38-1.12
-3.81%
Innovator US Small Cap Pwr Buff ETF™ Oct

BHPLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHPLF has been loosely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BHPLF jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHPLF
1D Price
Change %
BHPLF100%
-1.67%
BHP - BHPLF
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.92%
TECK - BHPLF
30%
Poorly correlated
-9.36%
RIO - BHPLF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.45%
FCX - BHPLF
28%
Poorly correlated
-12.28%
CSCCF - BHPLF
28%
Poorly correlated
-13.76%
More

CSCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSCCF has been closely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CSCCF jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSCCF
1D Price
Change %
CSCCF100%
-13.76%
HBM - CSCCF
74%
Closely correlated
-7.54%
LUNMF - CSCCF
72%
Closely correlated
-8.72%
FCX - CSCCF
72%
Closely correlated
-12.28%
IVPAF - CSCCF
70%
Closely correlated
-9.42%
TECK - CSCCF
70%
Closely correlated
-9.36%
More