BHPLF
Price
$22.43
Change
-$1.48 (-6.19%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
156.31B
FCX
Price
$37.35
Change
-$0.28 (-0.74%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
67.89B
82 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BHPLF vs FCX

Header iconBHPLF vs FCX Comparison
Open Charts BHPLF vs FCXBanner chart's image
BHP Group
Price$22.43
Change-$1.48 (-6.19%)
Volume$2.35K
Capitalization156.31B
Freeport-McMoran
Price$37.35
Change-$0.28 (-0.74%)
Volume$10.96M
Capitalization67.89B
BHPLF vs FCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
BHPLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHPLF vs. FCX commentary
Apr 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHPLF is a Hold and FCX is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BHPLF: $22.43 vs. FCX: $37.35)
Brand notoriety: BHPLF: Not notable vs. FCX: Notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHPLF: 1% vs. FCX: 56%
Market capitalization -- BHPLF: $156.31B vs. FCX: $67.89B
BHPLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $156.31B. FCX’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $67.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHPLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFCX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BHPLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FCX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCX is a better buy in the long-term than BHPLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHPLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHPLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FCX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCX is a better buy in the short-term than BHPLF.

Price Growth

BHPLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -4.26% price change this week, while FCX (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +13.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCX is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.82% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHPLF($156B) has a higher market cap than FCX($67.9B). FCX has higher P/E ratio than BHPLF: FCX (36.98) vs BHPLF (8.64). FCX YTD gains are higher at: -1.104 vs. BHPLF (-5.595). BHPLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 35.8B vs. FCX (8.59B). BHPLF has more cash in the bank: 10.1B vs. FCX (4.76B). FCX has less debt than BHPLF: FCX (9.85B) vs BHPLF (14.7B). BHPLF has higher revenues than FCX: BHPLF (60.3B) vs FCX (22.9B).
BHPLFFCXBHPLF / FCX
Capitalization156B67.9B230%
EBITDA35.8B8.59B417%
Gain YTD-5.595-1.104507%
P/E Ratio8.6436.9823%
Revenue60.3B22.9B263%
Total Cash10.1B4.76B212%
Total Debt14.7B9.85B149%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHPLF vs FCX: Fundamental Ratings
BHPLF
FCX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2815
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4831
SMR RATING
1..100
10065
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7262
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9572
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BHPLF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as FCX (19) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that BHPLF’s stock grew similarly to FCX’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as BHPLF (48) in the null industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew similarly to BHPLF’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's SMR Rating (65) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHPLF (100) in the null industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHPLF’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as BHPLF (72) in the null industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew similarly to BHPLF’s over the last 12 months.

FCX's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as BHPLF (95) in the null industry. This means that FCX’s stock grew similarly to BHPLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHPLFFCX
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BHPLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MHD11.230.10
+0.90%
Blackrock Muniholdings Fund
FDLS27.440.08
+0.30%
Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF
PBE61.08-0.03
-0.05%
Invesco Biotechnology & Genome ETF
NDIV26.93-0.04
-0.15%
Amplify Natural Resources Div Inc ETF
DFSV26.56-0.10
-0.38%
Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF

BHPLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHPLF has been loosely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BHPLF jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHPLF
1D Price
Change %
BHPLF100%
-6.19%
BHP - BHPLF
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.23%
TECK - BHPLF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
RIO - BHPLF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
FCX - BHPLF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
CSCCF - BHPLF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
More

FCX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCX has been closely correlated with SCCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCX jumps, then SCCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCX
1D Price
Change %
FCX100%
-0.74%
SCCO - FCX
90%
Closely correlated
-1.62%
TECK - FCX
89%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
HBM - FCX
82%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
LUNMF - FCX
79%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
ERO - FCX
77%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
More