Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIDAX vs FKTIX
BIDAX vs FKTIX Comparison
Open Charts BIDAX vs FKTIX
iShares Municipal Bond Index Investor A
Price$10.68
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets212.36M
Franklin Federal Tax Free Income A1
Price$10.43
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.95B
BIDAX vs FKTIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIDAX vs. FKTIX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIDAX is a Hold and FKTIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTIX has more cash in the bank: 7.95B vs. BIDAX (212M). FKTIX pays higher dividends than BIDAX: FKTIX (3.78) vs BIDAX (3.00). BIDAX was incepted earlier than FKTIX: BIDAX (25 years) vs FKTIX (42 years). FKTIX (0.64) is less costly to investors than BIDAX (0.58). BIDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. FKTIX (15.32). BIDAX (1000) and FKTIX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FKTIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.10 vs. BIDAX (-0.21). BIDAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.32 vs. FKTIX (-2.61).
| BIDAX | FKTIX | BIDAX / FKTIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.64 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.64 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.468 | -1.819 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 212M | 7.95B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.00 | 3.78 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.21 | -0.10 | 213% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.55 | 7.25 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.32 | -2.61 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.10 | -1.75 | -975% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers