Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIDAX vs FSMUX
BIDAX vs FSMUX Comparison
Open Charts BIDAX vs FSMUX
iShares Municipal Bond Index Investor A
Price$10.68
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets212.36M
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond
Price$8.58
Change-$0.02 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.99B
BIDAX vs FSMUX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMUX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. BIDAX (212M). FSMUX pays higher dividends than BIDAX: FSMUX (3.94) vs BIDAX (3.00). BIDAX was incepted earlier than FSMUX: BIDAX (25 years) vs FSMUX (4 years). BIDAX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMUX (0.44). FSMUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. BIDAX (37.00). FSMUX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIDAX: FSMUX (0) vs BIDAX (1000). FSMUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.40 vs. BIDAX (-0.21).
| BIDAX | FSMUX | BIDAX / FSMUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.19 | 263% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.44 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.468 | -1.346 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 212M | 12B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.00 | 3.94 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.21 | 0.40 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.55 | 10.31 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.32 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.10 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers