BIDCF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
DTSS
Price
$2.19
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Ad is loading...

BIDCF vs DTSS

Header iconBIDCF vs DTSS Comparison
Open Charts BIDCF vs DTSSBanner chart's image
Blockchaink2
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$9.89K
CapitalizationN/A
Datasea
Price$2.19
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$103.35K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BIDCF vs DTSS Comparison Chart
Loading...
DTSS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
BIDCF vs. DTSS commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIDCF is a Hold and DTSS is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BIDCF: $0.08 vs. DTSS: $2.21)
Brand notoriety: BIDCF and DTSS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BIDCF: 28% vs. DTSS: 5%
Market capitalization -- BIDCF: $2.57M vs. DTSS: $20.79M
BIDCF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.57M. DTSS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $20.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BIDCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDTSS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BIDCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DTSS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DTSS is a better buy in the long-term than BIDCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DTSS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DTSS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

BIDCF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -7.01% price change this week, while DTSS (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

DTSS is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DTSS($20.8M) has a higher market cap than BIDCF($2.57M). BIDCF YTD gains are higher at: 7.455 vs. DTSS (-37.793). BIDCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -381.84K vs. DTSS (-9.6M). DTSS has more cash in the bank: 438K vs. BIDCF (16.6K). BIDCF has less debt than DTSS: BIDCF (564K) vs DTSS (775K). DTSS has higher revenues than BIDCF: DTSS (25.1M) vs BIDCF (60.7K).
BIDCFDTSSBIDCF / DTSS
Capitalization2.57M20.8M12%
EBITDA-381.84K-9.6M4%
Gain YTD7.455-37.793-20%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue60.7K25.1M0%
Total Cash16.6K438K4%
Total Debt564K775K73%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BIDCF vs DTSS: Fundamental Ratings
BIDCF
DTSS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3331
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6565
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DTSS's Valuation (44) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as BIDCF (66) in the null industry. This means that DTSS’s stock grew similarly to BIDCF’s over the last 12 months.

DTSS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as BIDCF (100) in the null industry. This means that DTSS’s stock grew similarly to BIDCF’s over the last 12 months.

DTSS's SMR Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as BIDCF (100) in the null industry. This means that DTSS’s stock grew similarly to BIDCF’s over the last 12 months.

DTSS's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as BIDCF (65) in the null industry. This means that DTSS’s stock grew similarly to BIDCF’s over the last 12 months.

DTSS's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as BIDCF (100) in the null industry. This means that DTSS’s stock grew similarly to BIDCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DTSS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DTSS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME21.660.39
+1.83%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X67612.720000571.609400
+0.85%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA221.331.76
+0.80%
Tesla
SPY582.302.52
+0.43%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL231.78-2.07
-0.89%
Apple

BIDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BIDCF and KCRD have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BIDCF and KCRD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BIDCF
1D Price
Change %
BIDCF100%
N/A
KCRD - BIDCF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTSS - BIDCF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
TAOP - BIDCF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.05%
BWLKF - BIDCF
8%
Poorly correlated
+13.17%
BTGHF - BIDCF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DTSS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DTSS has been loosely correlated with LYFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DTSS jumps, then LYFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DTSS
1D Price
Change %
DTSS100%
-1.35%
LYFT - DTSS
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
ELWS - DTSS
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
UBER - DTSS
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.56%
LTCH - DTSS
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
SEAC - DTSS
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More