BIDCF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 7 closing price
Capitalization
2.57M
ML
Price
$87.78
Change
+$0.68 (+0.78%)
Updated
Mar 11, 02:49 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
698.72M
Ad is loading...

BIDCF vs ML

Header iconBIDCF vs ML Comparison
Open Charts BIDCF vs MLBanner chart's image
Blockchaink2
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization2.57M
MoneyLion
Price$87.78
Change+$0.68 (+0.78%)
Volume$200
Capitalization698.72M
BIDCF vs ML Comparison Chart
Loading...
ML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BIDCF vs. ML commentary
Mar 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIDCF is a Hold and ML is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 11, 2025
Stock price -- (BIDCF: $0.06 vs. ML: $87.10)
Brand notoriety: BIDCF and ML are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BIDCF: 2% vs. ML: 104%
Market capitalization -- BIDCF: $2.57M vs. ML: $698.72M
BIDCF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.57M. ML’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $698.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BIDCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileML’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BIDCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ML’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BIDCF is a better buy in the long-term than ML.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ML’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ML’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BIDCF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +14.56% price change this week, while ML (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -3.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

ML is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-3.56% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ML($699M) has a higher market cap than BIDCF($2.57M). ML YTD gains are higher at: 1.267 vs. BIDCF (-11.278). ML has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.17M vs. BIDCF (-381.84K). ML has more cash in the bank: 92.2M vs. BIDCF (16.6K). BIDCF has less debt than ML: BIDCF (564K) vs ML (190M). ML has higher revenues than BIDCF: ML (423M) vs BIDCF (60.7K).
BIDCFMLBIDCF / ML
Capitalization2.57M699M0%
EBITDA-381.84K7.17M-5%
Gain YTD-11.2781.267-890%
P/E RatioN/A1.80-
Revenue60.7K423M0%
Total Cash16.6K92.2M0%
Total Debt564K190M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BIDCF: Fundamental Ratings
BIDCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
26
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
88
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ML
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TGVAX27.64N/A
N/A
Thornburg International Equity A
GMAOX22.49N/A
N/A
GMO Quality Cyclicals I
HLIEX24.73N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Equity Income I
ISPVX18.92N/A
N/A
Macquarie Smid Cap Core Fund R6
MIFOX27.98N/A
N/A
Marsico Focus Institutional

BIDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BIDCF and KCRD have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BIDCF and KCRD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BIDCF
1D Price
Change %
BIDCF100%
N/A
KCRD - BIDCF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TAOP - BIDCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+8.47%
DTSS - BIDCF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
ML - BIDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
ALIT - BIDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.14%
More

ML and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ML has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ML jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ML
1D Price
Change %
ML100%
-0.75%
COIN - ML
50%
Loosely correlated
-17.58%
RIOT - ML
43%
Loosely correlated
-9.68%
CLSK - ML
38%
Loosely correlated
-9.63%
QTWO - ML
38%
Loosely correlated
-5.97%
LYFT - ML
34%
Loosely correlated
-7.37%
More