BIDCF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.57M
TAOP
Price
$0.32
Change
+$0.01 (+3.23%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.15M
Ad is loading...

BIDCF vs TAOP

Header iconBIDCF vs TAOP Comparison
Open Charts BIDCF vs TAOPBanner chart's image
Blockchaink2
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$26.53K
Capitalization2.57M
Taoping
Price$0.32
Change+$0.01 (+3.23%)
Volume$1.22M
Capitalization2.15M
BIDCF vs TAOP Comparison Chart
Loading...
BIDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAOP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BIDCF vs. TAOP commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIDCF is a Hold and TAOP is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BIDCF: $0.05 vs. TAOP: $0.32)
Brand notoriety: BIDCF and TAOP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BIDCF: 2253% vs. TAOP: 25%
Market capitalization -- BIDCF: $2.57M vs. TAOP: $2.15M
BIDCF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.57M. TAOP’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $2.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BIDCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTAOP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BIDCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TAOP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TAOP is a better buy in the long-term than BIDCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BIDCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAOP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BIDCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TAOP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BIDCF is a better buy in the short-term than TAOP.

Price Growth

BIDCF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -18.50% price change this week, while TAOP (@Packaged Software) price change was -9.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

TAOP is expected to report earnings on Sep 25, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIDCF($2.57M) has a higher market cap than TAOP($2.15M). BIDCF YTD gains are higher at: -21.805 vs. TAOP (-23.751). TAOP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.96M vs. BIDCF (-381.84K). TAOP has more cash in the bank: 460K vs. BIDCF (16.6K). BIDCF has less debt than TAOP: BIDCF (564K) vs TAOP (6.8M). TAOP has higher revenues than BIDCF: TAOP (31M) vs BIDCF (60.7K).
BIDCFTAOPBIDCF / TAOP
Capitalization2.57M2.15M120%
EBITDA-381.84K5.96M-6%
Gain YTD-21.805-23.75192%
P/E RatioN/A25.71-
Revenue60.7K31M0%
Total Cash16.6K460K4%
Total Debt564K6.8M8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BIDCF vs TAOP: Fundamental Ratings
BIDCF
TAOP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5140
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10092
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9592
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10089
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TAOP's Valuation (30) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as BIDCF (61) in the null industry. This means that TAOP’s stock grew similarly to BIDCF’s over the last 12 months.

TAOP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as BIDCF (100) in the null industry. This means that TAOP’s stock grew similarly to BIDCF’s over the last 12 months.

TAOP's SMR Rating (92) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as BIDCF (100) in the null industry. This means that TAOP’s stock grew similarly to BIDCF’s over the last 12 months.

TAOP's Price Growth Rating (92) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as BIDCF (95) in the null industry. This means that TAOP’s stock grew similarly to BIDCF’s over the last 12 months.

TAOP's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as BIDCF (100) in the null industry. This means that TAOP’s stock grew similarly to BIDCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BIDCFTAOP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
70%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
88%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BIDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAOP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LSEA8.140.09
+1.12%
Landsea Homes Corp
WOR42.010.19
+0.45%
Worthington Enterprises
MUSA476.29-6.33
-1.31%
Murphy USA
HLP1.30-0.03
-2.26%
Hongli Group
NAOV0.50-0.02
-3.81%
NanoVibronix

BIDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BIDCF and KCRD have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BIDCF and KCRD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BIDCF
1D Price
Change %
BIDCF100%
-2.62%
KCRD - BIDCF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TAOP - BIDCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.22%
DTSS - BIDCF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.45%
ML - BIDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
ALIT - BIDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TAOP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TAOP and CFCI have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TAOP and CFCI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TAOP
1D Price
Change %
TAOP100%
+2.22%
CFCI - TAOP
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTSS - TAOP
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.45%
GEN - TAOP
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
LFMD - TAOP
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.66%
EA - TAOP
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
More