Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIECX vs TRIGX
BIECX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts BIECX vs TRIGX
Brandes International Equity C
Price$24.02
Change-$0.16 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$20.48
Change-$0.16 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.82B
BIECX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIECX vs. TRIGX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIECX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. BIECX (1.52B). TRIGX pays higher dividends than BIECX: TRIGX (2.21) vs BIECX (1.65). BIECX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: BIECX (12 years) vs TRIGX (26 years). BIECX (1.87) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). BIECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.26 vs. TRIGX (15.90). BIECX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.61 vs. BIECX (14.60). BIECX return over 5 years is better than : 127.23 vs. TRIGX (111.96).
| BIECX | TRIGX | BIECX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.87 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.87 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.529 | 21.483 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 14.8B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 2.21 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.60 | 18.61 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.75 | 55.59 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 127.23 | 111.96 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.20 | 61.83 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement