It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BIIB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BIIB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
BIIB (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а -1.31% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.07%.
BIIB is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
BIIB | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BIIB | QLV | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago59% | 1 day ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 1 day ago65% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago69% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago84% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago53% | 1 day ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago68% | 9 days ago66% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 6 days ago81% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BIIB has been loosely correlated with AMGN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BIIB jumps, then AMGN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BIIB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BIIB | 100% | -0.07% | ||
AMGN - BIIB | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.60% | ||
OGN - BIIB | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.62% | ||
NVS - BIIB | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
AZN - BIIB | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.13% | ||
GILD - BIIB | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.48% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLV has been loosely correlated with MSGS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLV jumps, then MSGS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QLV | 100% | +0.62% | ||
MSGS - QLV | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.59% | ||
PECO - QLV | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
DTM - QLV | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.14% | ||
BIIB - QLV | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
RYAN - QLV | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.51% | ||
More |