Investors seeking exposure to China’s high‑growth digital entertainment space often compare BILI (Bilibili Inc.) and NTES (NetEase, Inc.). Both companies operate large user‑generated video platforms and a suite of online gaming titles, yet they differ in revenue composition, recent earnings momentum, and market sentiment. This comparison is relevant for growth‑oriented traders, dividend‑seeking investors, and anyone evaluating AI‑driven trading strategies that target the Asian tech sector.
Bilibili, a Chinese online entertainment platform best known for its user‑generated video and live‑streaming services, has experienced pronounced price momentum over the “recent weeks.” Analyst revisions on earnings estimates have surged, with Zacks reporting a 131% increase in the consensus Q1 EPS estimate and a 50% uplift in the 12‑month outlook. The Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) reflects the optimism surrounding BILI’s growing advertising and gaming revenues. In the latest quarter, daily active users (DAUs) and total time‑spent metrics continued to rise, supporting a projected break‑even on an operating basis. Bank of America recently reiterated a Buy rating and lifted its price target, citing strong ad‑revenue growth and a “blockbuster” game pipeline. However, BILI remains vulnerable to tighter Chinese content regulations, which could affect its long‑form video segment.
NetEase, a leading internet and game services provider, posted Q2 2024 results that highlighted a 6.1% year‑over‑year revenue increase to RMB25.5 billion, driven primarily by gaming and related value‑added services (RMB20.1 billion). Gaming revenue grew 6.7% YoY, with flagship titles such as Naraka: Bladepoint achieving record DAUs and strong iOS grossing performance. Despite the revenue bump, NTES’s share price has underperformed, falling roughly 16% over the past two weeks and down 14% year‑to‑date, reflecting investor concerns over slower growth in China’s gaming market and recent cutbacks on Japanese studio investments. Analysts remain bullish, with a consensus Buy rating from four major houses and a price target around ¥19‑20, indicating upside potential if growth momentum resumes.
The Tickeron platform hosts hundreds of AI‑driven trading bots that cover thousands of tickers, each employing distinct strategies—ranging from short‑term scalping to multi‑month trend following. Only the best‑performing models that match current market conditions appear on the Trending AI Robots page. These curated bots typically show win rates above 55% and Sharpe ratios (risk‑adjusted return metrics) exceeding 1.0, indicating consistent risk‑adjusted performance. Traders can filter by asset class, time horizon, or risk tolerance, allowing a tailored approach to capital allocation across equities like BILI and NTES.
Based on observable factors—BILI’s strong earnings‑estimate revisions, higher recent price momentum, and expanding ad‑revenues—Tickeron’s AI models assign a slight probability premium to BILI for aggressive, short‑to‑mid‑term strategies. Conversely, NTES’s lower volatility, consistent gaming cash flow, and valuation discount provide a modest edge for stability‑focused bots. Overall, the AI leans toward NTES for risk‑adjusted positioning while acknowledging BILI as the higher‑reward alternative.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BILI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNTES’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BILI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTES’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BILI (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а -6.08% price change this week, while NTES (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was -3.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.36%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.39%.
BILI is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2026.
NTES is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2026.
Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
@Electronics/Appliances (-0.84% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
| BILI | NTES | BILI / NTES | |
| Capitalization | 7.05B | 77.7B | 9% |
| EBITDA | 1.59B | 40.2B | 4% |
| Gain YTD | -31.822 | -10.255 | 310% |
| P/E Ratio | 33.88 | 15.56 | 218% |
| Revenue | 30.8B | 114B | 27% |
| Total Cash | 24.2B | 171B | 14% |
| Total Debt | 9.57B | 11B | 87% |
BILI | NTES | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 76 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 74 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 68 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 43 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NTES's Valuation (28) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BILI (63). This means that NTES’s stock grew somewhat faster than BILI’s over the last 12 months.
NTES's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as BILI (100). This means that NTES’s stock grew similarly to BILI’s over the last 12 months.
NTES's SMR Rating (43) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as BILI (74). This means that NTES’s stock grew similarly to BILI’s over the last 12 months.
NTES's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as BILI (81). This means that NTES’s stock grew similarly to BILI’s over the last 12 months.
NTES's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as BILI (100). This means that NTES’s stock grew similarly to BILI’s over the last 12 months.
| BILI | NTES | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 67% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BILI has been loosely correlated with YMM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BILI jumps, then YMM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BILI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BILI | 100% | -2.53% | ||
| YMM - BILI | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| BIDU - BILI | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| WB - BILI | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| NTES - BILI | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| TUYA - BILI | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTES has been loosely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTES jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTES | 100% | +0.20% | ||
| BILI - NTES | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.53% | ||
| YMM - NTES | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| RIOT - NTES | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| CLSK - NTES | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| KC - NTES | 33% Poorly correlated | -2.78% | ||
More | ||||