Advertisement
BILI vs NTES
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Bilibili (BILI) vs. NetEase (NTES) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Bilibili (BILI) operates a major Chinese video-sharing and streaming platform focused on younger audiences, while NetEase (NTES) emphasizes online gaming, music, and digital entertainment services.
- Over recent weeks, BILI has shown higher volatility with year-to-date declines near 29%, contrasting with NTES's more stable positioning and positive year-to-date returns around 9.5%.
- Both companies face upcoming quarterly earnings releases in late August 2026, providing potential catalysts amid broader market conditions in Chinese internet equities.
- Sector exposure centers on China's digital consumer space, with NTES benefiting from diversified revenue streams including gaming and NTES Cloud Music reporting timelines.
- Relative momentum favors NTES in recent market activity, while BILI contends with sharper price swings and a narrower focus on video community engagement.
- Market sentiment reflects caution for both amid macroeconomic factors in China, though NTES demonstrates comparatively stronger trailing performance metrics.
Introduction
Investors and traders often compare Bilibili (BILI) and NetEase (NTES) as prominent Chinese internet companies with overlapping exposure to digital entertainment and consumer trends. This analysis examines their business models, recent price behavior, and relative positioning in the current environment. The comparison appeals to those seeking insights into high-growth technology names in emerging markets, particularly participants focused on volatility, earnings catalysts, and cross-border equity dynamics. Data draws from observable market activity over recent periods to highlight contrasts without forward projections.
Bilibili Overview and Recent Performance
Bilibili (BILI) functions as an iconic brand and leading video community platform targeting young generations in China, with core operations in streaming, user-generated content, and related digital services. In recent market activity, the stock has experienced notable volatility, closing near 17.44 on August 14, 2026, after sessions marked by intraday swings. Year-to-date returns stand approximately 29% lower, with one-month performance showing declines around 4-5% amid broader pressures on Chinese American Depositary Receipts. Key influences include operational focus on content expansion and user engagement metrics, alongside anticipation for the company's second-quarter 2026 results scheduled for August 27. Sentiment has reflected sensitivity to sector-wide movements and macroeconomic signals from the region.
NetEase Overview and Recent Performance
NetEase (NTES) delivers a diversified portfolio centered on online games, digital music through NetEase Cloud Music, and other internet technology services. Recent market activity has featured relative stability, with the stock closing around 125.12 on August 14, 2026. Year-to-date returns register near 9.5% positive in available benchmarks, contrasting with more pronounced swings elsewhere in the sector. One-month changes appear modest, near flat to slightly negative in certain windows. Developments include preparation for second-quarter and first-half 2026 results expected around August 20, alongside steady capital structure updates. Performance has been shaped by gaming revenue resilience and broader entertainment ecosystem positioning within China-focused equities.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots page that highlights select artificial intelligence trading systems optimized for prevailing market conditions. The platform offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots capable of trading thousands of different tickers across varied strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles. Only the strongest and most suitable options earn placement in this section based on backtested statistics, risk-adjusted returns, and adaptability. Available bots span ranges of annualized returns, drawdown profiles, and win rates, allowing users to explore diverse approaches from short-term momentum tactics to longer-horizon trend following. All systems feature unique combinations of indicators, position sizing, and ticker universes. For further details on current selections, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Bilibili (BILI) centers on video community and streaming, creating concentrated exposure to user-generated content trends and youth demographics in China, whereas NetEase (NTES) leverages a broader model incorporating gaming titles, music streaming, and ancillary digital services for more diversified revenue. Growth drivers differ accordingly, with BILI tied closely to content monetization and platform stickiness, while NTES benefits from established gaming franchises and recurring user spending. Recent momentum shows BILI with sharper drawdowns and elevated volatility compared to NTES's steadier trajectory in the same timeframe. Risk factors include regulatory and macroeconomic sensitivities common to both, though BILI's narrower focus may amplify sector-specific swings. Market sentiment has generally reflected greater resilience for NTES amid comparable China internet exposure, highlighting trade-offs between specialized platform growth and diversified entertainment scale.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, relative stability, and positioning ahead of earnings, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a probabilistic preference toward NetEase (NTES) in the current environment. NTES exhibits stronger year-to-date performance and lower recent volatility compared to Bilibili (BILI), alongside diversified business lines that may support steadier momentum. This assessment draws from measurable market data rather than forecasts, recognizing that outcomes depend on evolving catalysts and broader conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BILI is a Buy and NTES is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BILI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNTES’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BILI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NTES’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BILI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTES’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BILI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NTES’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BILI (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а -4.24% price change this week, while NTES (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was -1.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.75%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -3.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.05%.
Reported Earning Dates
BILI is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.
NTES is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Internet Software/Services (+0.40% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
@Electronics/Appliances (-3.74% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
| BILI | NTES | BILI / NTES | |
| Capitalization | 6.92B | 79.6B | 9% |
| EBITDA | 1.59B | 40.2B | 4% |
| Gain YTD | -32.900 | -9.226 | 357% |
| P/E Ratio | 33.12 | 16.42 | 202% |
| Revenue | 30.8B | 114B | 27% |
| Total Cash | 24.2B | 171B | 14% |
| Total Debt | 9.57B | 11B | 87% |
BILI | NTES | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 55 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 73 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NTES's Valuation (18) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BILI (59). This means that NTES’s stock grew somewhat faster than BILI’s over the last 12 months.
NTES's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BILI (100). This means that NTES’s stock grew somewhat faster than BILI’s over the last 12 months.
NTES's SMR Rating (43) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as BILI (73). This means that NTES’s stock grew similarly to BILI’s over the last 12 months.
NTES's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as BILI (75). This means that NTES’s stock grew similarly to BILI’s over the last 12 months.
NTES's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BILI (100). This means that NTES’s stock grew somewhat faster than BILI’s over the last 12 months.
| BILI | NTES | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 80% | 13 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LINK.X | 11.619158 | 0.087918 | +0.76% |
| Chainlink cryptocurrency | |||
| EGLD.X | 3.518488 | -0.025550 | -0.72% |
| MultiversX cryptocurrency | |||
| MBOX.X | 0.000616 | -0.000008 | -1.35% |
| MOBOX cryptocurrency | |||
| BEL.X | 0.114674 | -0.001768 | -1.52% |
| Bella Protocol cryptocurrency | |||
| IOTX.X | 0.002798 | -0.000095 | -3.29% |
| IoTeX cryptocurrency | |||
BILI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BILI has been loosely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BILI jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BILI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BILI | 100% | -3.28% | ||
| WB - BILI | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| YMM - BILI | 57% Loosely correlated | -3.88% | ||
| BIDU - BILI | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| NTES - BILI | 48% Loosely correlated | -4.06% | ||
| TUYA - BILI | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.22% | ||
More | ||||
NTES and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTES has been loosely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTES jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTES | 100% | -4.06% | ||
| BILI - NTES | 47% Loosely correlated | -3.28% | ||
| YMM - NTES | 44% Loosely correlated | -3.88% | ||
| SOHU - NTES | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| RIOT - NTES | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| CLSK - NTES | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
More | ||||