Ad is loading...
BILPX vs HHCZX
BILPX vs HHCZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BILPX vs. HHCZX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BILPX is a StrongBuy and HHCZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BILPX has more cash in the bank: 4.58B vs. HHCZX (92M). BILPX pays higher dividends than HHCZX: BILPX (1.55) vs HHCZX (0.56). BILPX was incepted earlier than HHCZX: BILPX (17 years) vs HHCZX (17 years). HHCZX (3.07) is less costly to investors than BILPX (1.37). HHCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 607.00 vs. BILPX (32.00). HHCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BILPX: HHCZX (2500) vs BILPX (2000000). BILPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.01 vs. HHCZX (2.19). HHCZX return over 5 years is better than : 33.27 vs. BILPX (17.57).
| BILPX | HHCZX | BILPX / HHCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 2.38 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 3.07 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.500 | -0.914 | -164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 2500 | 80,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.58B | 92M | 4,975% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 0.56 | 275% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.01 | 2.19 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.93 | 12.92 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.57 | 33.27 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.81 | 1.96 | -1,418% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...