Ad is loading...
BIMBX vs CSQAX
BIMBX vs CSQAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIMBX vs. CSQAX commentary
May 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIMBX is a Hold and CSQAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSQAX pays higher dividends than BIMBX: CSQAX (6.43) vs BIMBX (3.95). BIMBX was incepted earlier than CSQAX: BIMBX (10 years) vs CSQAX (13 years). CSQAX (1.47) is less costly to investors than BIMBX (0.93). BIMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. CSQAX (214.00). CSQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIMBX: CSQAX (100) vs BIMBX (2000000). BIMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.02 vs. CSQAX (-0.53). BIMBX return over 5 years is better than : 19.87 vs. CSQAX (16.42).
| BIMBX | CSQAX | BIMBX / CSQAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.15 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.47 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.574 | 0.472 | 546% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 100 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.58B | N/A | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.95 | 6.43 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.02 | -0.53 | -1,145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.88 | 7.10 | 238% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.87 | 16.42 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 15.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...