Ad is loading...
BINAX vs RGFTX
BINAX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts BINAX vs RGFTX
BlackRock Infrastructure Sust Opps Inv A
Price$9.58
Change+$0.12 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.62M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$9.68
Change-$0.03 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets347.34M
BINAX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGFTX has more cash in the bank: 347M vs. BINAX (9.62M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than BINAX: RGFTX (3.01) vs BINAX (1.53). BINAX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: BINAX (4 years) vs RGFTX (8 years). BINAX (5.06) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.24). RGFTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. BINAX (57.00). RGFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than BINAX: RGFTX (0) vs BINAX (1000). RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.18 vs. BINAX (12.28).
| BINAX | RGFTX | BINAX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.91 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.06 | 1.24 | 408% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.486 | 7.759 | 109% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.62M | 347M | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 3.01 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.28 | 15.18 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.13 | 9.90 | -32% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 44.00 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers