Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BINC vs CGMS
BINC vs CGMS Comparison
Open Charts BINC vs CGMS
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
Price$52.40
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
Volume$1.15M
Net Assets9.28B
Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Inc ETF
Price$27.23
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
Volume$641.68K
Net Assets2.69B
BINC vs CGMS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BINC vs. CGMS commentary
Jun 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BINC is a Hold and CGMS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BINC has more net assets: 9.28B vs. CGMS (2.69B). BINC has a higher annual dividend yield than CGMS: BINC (2.547) vs CGMS (2.055). BINC was incepted earlier than CGMS: BINC (2 years) vs CGMS (3 years). CGMS (0.39) and BINC (0.40) have comparable expense ratios . BINC has a higher turnover CGMS (39.00) vs CGMS (39.00).
| BINC | CGMS | BINC / CGMS | |
| Gain YTD | 2.547 | 2.055 | 124% |
| Net Assets | 9.28B | 2.69B | 344% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.39 | 103% |
| Turnover | 200.00 | 39.00 | 513% |
| Yield | 6.46 | 5.72 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BINC | CGMS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 5% | 4 days ago 38% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 15% | 4 days ago 29% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 44% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 19% | 13 days ago 41% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 5% | 4 days ago 33% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% | 4 days ago 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CGMS and DBD have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGMS and DBD's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGMS | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| DBD - CGMS | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.84% | ||
| NFE - CGMS | 14% Poorly correlated | -6.04% |