Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BINIX vs RERFX
BINIX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts BINIX vs RERFX
Baron International Growth Institutional
Price$31.37
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets351.68M
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$60.46
Change-$0.07 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.64B
BINIX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BINIX vs. RERFX commentary
Jul 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BINIX is a Hold and RERFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. BINIX (352M). RERFX pays higher dividends than BINIX: RERFX (0.90) vs BINIX (0.79). BINIX was incepted earlier than RERFX: BINIX (16 years) vs RERFX (23 years). BINIX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). RERFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BINIX (24.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BINIX: RERFX (250) vs BINIX (1000000). BINIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.16 vs. RERFX (2.18). BINIX return over 5 years is better than : 22.49 vs. RERFX (14.02).
| BINIX | RERFX | BINIX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.52 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.52 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.766 | 12.672 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 352M | 134B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.90 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.16 | 2.18 | 649% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.72 | 31.62 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.49 | 14.02 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.37 | 24.77 | 272% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement