Ad is loading...
BIO
Price
$320.31
Change
-$29.92 (-8.54%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
88 days until earnings call
WAT
Price
$358.46
Change
-$18.26 (-4.85%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
86 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BIO vs WAT

Header iconBIO vs WAT Comparison
Open Charts BIO vs WATBanner chart's image
Bio-Rad Laboratories
Price$320.31
Change-$29.92 (-8.54%)
Volume$286.59K
CapitalizationN/A
Waters
Price$358.46
Change-$18.26 (-4.85%)
Volume$689.69K
CapitalizationN/A
BIO vs WAT Comparison Chart
Loading...
BIO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BIO vs. WAT commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIO is a Sell and WAT is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BIO: $320.31 vs. WAT: $358.46)
Brand notoriety: BIO and WAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BIO: 91% vs. WAT: 154%
Market capitalization -- BIO: $9.79B vs. WAT: $20.38B
BIO [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $9.79B. WAT’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $20.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BIO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWAT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BIO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WAT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WAT is a better buy in the long-term than BIO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BIO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WAT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BIO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BIO is a better buy in the short-term than WAT.

Price Growth

BIO (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -13.25% price change this week, while WAT (@Medical Specialties) price change was -6.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -4.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

BIO is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

WAT is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (-4.23% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WAT($20.4B) has a higher market cap than BIO($9.79B). WAT has higher P/E ratio than BIO: WAT (31.78) vs BIO (3.64). WAT YTD gains are higher at: 8.878 vs. BIO (-0.799). WAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1B vs. BIO (-654.76M). BIO has more cash in the bank: 1.61B vs. WAT (396M). BIO has less debt than WAT: BIO (1.41B) vs WAT (2.44B). WAT has higher revenues than BIO: WAT (2.96B) vs BIO (2.67B).
BIOWATBIO / WAT
Capitalization9.79B20.4B48%
EBITDA-654.76M1B-65%
Gain YTD-0.7998.878-9%
P/E Ratio3.6431.7811%
Revenue2.67B2.96B90%
Total Cash1.61B396M406%
Total Debt1.41B2.44B58%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BIO vs WAT: Fundamental Ratings
BIO
WAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6662
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10043
SMR RATING
1..100
9020
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5433
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8828
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BIO's Valuation (78) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as WAT (81). This means that BIO’s stock grew similarly to WAT’s over the last 12 months.

WAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BIO (100). This means that WAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BIO’s over the last 12 months.

WAT's SMR Rating (20) in the Medical Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for BIO (90). This means that WAT’s stock grew significantly faster than BIO’s over the last 12 months.

WAT's Price Growth Rating (33) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as BIO (54). This means that WAT’s stock grew similarly to BIO’s over the last 12 months.

WAT's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BIO (88). This means that WAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BIO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BIOWAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BIO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HIDV73.51N/A
N/A
AB US High Dividend ETF
KOCT30.93-0.17
-0.56%
Innovator US Small Cap Pwr Buff ETF™ Oct
IVOV99.62-0.76
-0.76%
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
VOT257.36-2.25
-0.87%
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
GINN61.71-0.74
-1.18%
Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF