Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIOPX vs RGAFX
BIOPX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts BIOPX vs RGAFX
Baron Opportunity Retail
Price$50.81
Change-$0.09 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.54B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$82.28
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets320.87B
BIOPX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIOPX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIOPX is a StrongBuy and RGAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 321B vs. BIOPX (1.54B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than BIOPX: RGAFX (0.57) vs BIOPX (0.00). BIOPX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: BIOPX (25 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). BIOPX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). BIOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIOPX: RGAFX (250) vs BIOPX (2000). BIOPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.31 vs. RGAFX (9.60). BIOPX return over 5 years is better than : 59.51 vs. RGAFX (46.16).
| BIOPX | RGAFX | BIOPX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.34 | 385% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.34 | 385% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.999 | 10.562 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.54B | 321B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.57 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.31 | 9.60 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.50 | 55.18 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.51 | 46.16 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 160.36 | 87.01 | 184% |