Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIOPX vs RGAFX
BIOPX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts BIOPX vs RGAFX
Baron Opportunity Retail
Price$52.25
Change+$0.40 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$83.74
Change+$0.47 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.95B
BIOPX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIOPX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIOPX is a StrongBuy and RGAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 324B vs. BIOPX (1.65B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than BIOPX: RGAFX (0.57) vs BIOPX (0.00). BIOPX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: BIOPX (25 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). BIOPX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). BIOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIOPX: RGAFX (250) vs BIOPX (2000). BIOPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.17 vs. RGAFX (13.09). BIOPX return over 5 years is better than : 66.08 vs. RGAFX (48.16).
| BIOPX | RGAFX | BIOPX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.34 | 385% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.34 | 385% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.015 | 12.524 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.65B | 324B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.57 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.17 | 13.09 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.66 | 61.38 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.08 | 48.16 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.30 | 85.15 | 184% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement