Ad is loading...
BIP
Price
$34.20
Change
+$0.15 (+0.44%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
72 days until earnings call
CDUAF
Price
$24.68
Change
+$0.15 (+0.61%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

BIP vs CDUAF

Header iconBIP vs CDUAF Comparison
Open Charts BIP vs CDUAFBanner chart's image
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners
Price$34.20
Change+$0.15 (+0.44%)
Volume$362.56K
CapitalizationN/A
Canadian Utilities
Price$24.68
Change+$0.15 (+0.61%)
Volume$2.85K
CapitalizationN/A
BIP vs CDUAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BIP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BIP vs. CDUAF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIP is a Sell and CDUAF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BIP: $34.20 vs. CDUAF: $24.68)
Brand notoriety: BIP and CDUAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BIP: 113% vs. CDUAF: 140%
Market capitalization -- BIP: $14.36B vs. CDUAF: $6.71B
BIP [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $14.36B. CDUAF’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $6.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BIP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCDUAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BIP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CDUAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BIP and CDUAF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BIP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BIP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BIP (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -0.26% price change this week, while CDUAF (@Electric Utilities) price change was -0.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

BIP is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+0.29% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIP($14.4B) has a higher market cap than CDUAF($6.71B). BIP has higher P/E ratio than CDUAF: BIP (217.14) vs CDUAF (15.29). BIP YTD gains are higher at: 13.150 vs. CDUAF (2.739). BIP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.02B vs. CDUAF (1.95B). BIP has more cash in the bank: 2.44B vs. CDUAF (438M). CDUAF has less debt than BIP: CDUAF (10.2B) vs BIP (49.6B). BIP has higher revenues than CDUAF: BIP (17.9B) vs CDUAF (4.02B).
BIPCDUAFBIP / CDUAF
Capitalization14.4B6.71B214%
EBITDA7.02B1.95B360%
Gain YTD13.1502.739480%
P/E Ratio217.1415.291,420%
Revenue17.9B4.02B446%
Total Cash2.44B438M558%
Total Debt49.6B10.2B486%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BIP vs CDUAF: Fundamental Ratings
BIP
CDUAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
55100
SMR RATING
1..100
8768
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4756
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9930
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDUAF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as BIP (25) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that CDUAF’s stock grew similarly to BIP’s over the last 12 months.

BIP's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDUAF (100) in the null industry. This means that BIP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDUAF’s over the last 12 months.

CDUAF's SMR Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as BIP (87) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that CDUAF’s stock grew similarly to BIP’s over the last 12 months.

BIP's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CDUAF (56) in the null industry. This means that BIP’s stock grew similarly to CDUAF’s over the last 12 months.

CDUAF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BIP (99) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that CDUAF’s stock grew significantly faster than BIP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BIP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BIP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALPACA.X0.1776750.005838
+3.40%
Alpaca Finance cryptocurrency
RDUS17.730.38
+2.19%
Radius Recycling
RRC33.44-0.19
-0.56%
Range Resources Corp
OCFT2.32-0.02
-0.85%
OneConnect Financial Technology Co Ltd
BKE47.92-0.82
-1.68%
Buckle (The)

BIP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BIP has been loosely correlated with FTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BIP jumps, then FTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BIP
1D Price
Change %
BIP100%
+0.44%
FTS - BIP
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
ACLLF - BIP
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
NWE - BIP
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
AES - BIP
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
AEE - BIP
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
More

CDUAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDUAF has been loosely correlated with ACLLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDUAF jumps, then ACLLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDUAF
1D Price
Change %
CDUAF100%
+0.60%
ACLLF - CDUAF
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
FTS - CDUAF
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
BIP - CDUAF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
SRE - CDUAF
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.93%
HRNNF - CDUAF
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
More