Ad is loading...
BIVRX vs NLSAX
BIVRX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts BIVRX vs NLSAX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$17.84
Change-$0.03 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.01B
BIVRX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVRX vs. NLSAX commentary
Apr 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVRX is a Hold and NLSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.01B vs. BIVRX (1.13B). BIVRX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: BIVRX (3.43) vs NLSAX (0.00). BIVRX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: BIVRX (8 years) vs NLSAX (13 years). BIVRX (3.33) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). BIVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 170.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVRX: NLSAX (1000) vs BIVRX (5000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.06 vs. BIVRX (-3.22). BIVRX return over 5 years is better than : 84.28 vs. NLSAX (31.54).
| BIVRX | NLSAX | BIVRX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.33 | 1.68 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.33 | 1.68 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.884 | -3.196 | -28% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 1000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 7.01B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.22 | 2.06 | -156% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.17 | 4.71 | -386% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.28 | 31.54 | 267% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 34.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers