Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIVRX vs NLSAX
BIVRX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts BIVRX vs NLSAX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.24
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.47B
BIVRX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVRX vs. NLSAX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVRX is a Buy and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.47B vs. BIVRX (924M). BIVRX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: BIVRX (3.66) vs NLSAX (0.00). BIVRX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: BIVRX (8 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). BIVRX (3.42) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). BIVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 170.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVRX: NLSAX (1000) vs BIVRX (5000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.58 vs. BIVRX (-1.81). BIVRX return over 5 years is better than : 65.57 vs. NLSAX (25.76).
| BIVRX | NLSAX | BIVRX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.42 | 1.68 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.42 | 1.68 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.184 | 4.171 | -76% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 1000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 924M | 7.47B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.66 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.81 | 8.58 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | -25.41 | 18.10 | -140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.57 | 25.76 | 255% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement