Ad is loading...
BIVSX vs NLSIX
BIVSX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts BIVSX vs NLSIX
Invenomic Super Institutional
Price$16.99
Change+$0.17 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.06B
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$18.56
Change+$0.12 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.1B
BIVSX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVSX vs. NLSIX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVSX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.1B vs. BIVSX (1.06B). BIVSX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: BIVSX (4.06) vs NLSIX (0.02). BIVSX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: BIVSX (6 years) vs NLSIX (13 years). BIVSX (2.83) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). BIVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 170.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). NLSIX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVSX: NLSIX (1000000) vs BIVSX (50000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.50 vs. BIVSX (-7.52). BIVSX return over 5 years is better than : 71.58 vs. NLSIX (31.91).
| BIVSX | NLSIX | BIVSX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.83 | 1.32 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.83 | 1.32 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.160 | -1.653 | 252% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000000 | 1000000 | 5,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 7.1B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.06 | 0.02 | 18,516% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.52 | 3.50 | -215% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.98 | 8.93 | -257% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.58 | 31.91 | 224% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 41.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...