Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIVSX vs NLSIX
BIVSX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts BIVSX vs NLSIX
Invenomic Super Institutional
Price$17.08
Change-$0.14 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets937.2M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.52
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.45B
BIVSX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVSX vs. NLSIX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVSX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.45B vs. BIVSX (937M). BIVSX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: BIVSX (4.32) vs NLSIX (0.02). BIVSX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: BIVSX (6 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). BIVSX (2.92) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). BIVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 170.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). NLSIX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVSX: NLSIX (1000000) vs BIVSX (50000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. BIVSX (2.22). BIVSX return over 5 years is better than : 73.68 vs. NLSIX (27.94).
| BIVSX | NLSIX | BIVSX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.92 | 1.32 | 221% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.92 | 1.32 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.880 | 4.107 | -46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000000 | 1000000 | 5,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 937M | 7.45B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.32 | 0.02 | 20,536% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.22 | 8.11 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | -21.45 | 18.83 | -114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.68 | 27.94 | 264% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 51.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement