Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKLC vs FQAL
BKLC vs FQAL Comparison
Open Charts BKLC vs FQAL
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
Price$114.84
Change+$1.11 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.39B
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
Price$68.44
Change+$0.73 (+1.08%)
Volume$400
Net Assets1.04B
BKLC vs FQAL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKLC vs. FQAL commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKLC is a Buy and FQAL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKLC has more net assets: 3.39B vs. FQAL (1.04B). FQAL has a higher annual dividend yield than BKLC: FQAL (3.805) vs BKLC (1.819). BKLC was incepted earlier than FQAL: BKLC (5 years) vs FQAL (9 years). BKLC (0.00) has a lower expense ratio than FQAL (0.16). FQAL has a higher turnover BKLC (16.00) vs BKLC (16.00).
| BKLC | FQAL | BKLC / FQAL | |
| Gain YTD | 1.819 | 3.805 | 48% |
| Net Assets | 3.39B | 1.04B | 325% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.16 | - |
| Turnover | 16.00 | 34.00 | 47% |
| Yield | 1.21 | 1.22 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BKLC | FQAL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 74% | 16 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BKLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKLC has been closely correlated with AAPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BKLC jumps, then AAPL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BKLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BKLC | 100% | -0.47% | ||
| AAPL - BKLC | 69% Closely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| BLK - BKLC | 68% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| APH - BKLC | 67% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| MCO - BKLC | 66% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| TEL - BKLC | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
More | ||||
FQAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FQAL has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FQAL jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FQAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FQAL | 100% | -0.46% | ||
| PH - FQAL | 80% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| ISRG - FQAL | 70% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| SEIC - FQAL | 70% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| LIN - FQAL | 68% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| LAMR - FQAL | 66% Closely correlated | -0.96% | ||
More | ||||