Ad is loading...
BKLC vs FQAL
BKLC vs FQAL Comparison
Open Charts BKLC vs FQAL
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
Price$107.86
Change-$0.07 (-0.06%)
Volume$100
Net Assets2.61B
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
Price$64.70
Change-$0.11 (-0.17%)
Volume$224
Net Assets1B
BKLC vs FQAL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKLC vs. FQAL commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKLC is a Buy and FQAL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKLC has more net assets: 2.61B vs. FQAL (1B). FQAL has a higher annual dividend yield than BKLC: FQAL (-0.641) vs BKLC (-3.382). BKLC was incepted earlier than FQAL: BKLC (5 years) vs FQAL (9 years). BKLC (0.00) has a lower expense ratio than FQAL (0.16). FQAL has a higher turnover BKLC (16.00) vs BKLC (16.00).
| BKLC | FQAL | BKLC / FQAL | |
| Gain YTD | -3.382 | -0.641 | 528% |
| Net Assets | 2.61B | 1B | 260% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.16 | - |
| Turnover | 16.00 | 34.00 | 47% |
| Yield | 1.29 | 1.29 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BKLC | FQAL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BKLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKLC has been closely correlated with AAPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BKLC jumps, then AAPL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BKLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BKLC | 100% | +0.68% | ||
| AAPL - BKLC | 69% Closely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| BLK - BKLC | 68% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| APH - BKLC | 67% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| MCO - BKLC | 66% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| TEL - BKLC | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.62% | ||
More | ||||
FQAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FQAL has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FQAL jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FQAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FQAL | 100% | +0.48% | ||
| PH - FQAL | 79% Closely correlated | +2.97% | ||
| SEIC - FQAL | 70% Closely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| ISRG - FQAL | 68% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| LIN - FQAL | 68% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| BKNG - FQAL | 66% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
More | ||||