BKLRF
Price
$0.23
Change
+$0.01 (+4.55%)
Updated
Nov 25 closing price
VRRCF
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

BKLRF vs VRRCF

Header iconBKLRF vs VRRCF Comparison
Open Charts BKLRF vs VRRCFBanner chart's image
Berkeley Energy
Price$0.23
Change+$0.01 (+4.55%)
Volume$2.33K
CapitalizationN/A
VR Resources
Price$0.05
Change+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Volume$349.21K
CapitalizationN/A
BKLRF vs VRRCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BKLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRRCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKLRF vs. VRRCF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKLRF is a Buy and VRRCF is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BKLRF: $0.23 vs. VRRCF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: BKLRF and VRRCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKLRF: 88% vs. VRRCF: 280%
Market capitalization -- BKLRF: $127.67M vs. VRRCF: $16.33M
BKLRF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $127.67M. VRRCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $16.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKLRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVRRCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BKLRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VRRCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, VRRCF is a better buy in the long-term than BKLRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKLRF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRRCF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BKLRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • VRRCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VRRCF is a better buy in the short-term than BKLRF.

Price Growth

BKLRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VRRCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +13.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.60%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.58% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKLRF($128M) has a higher market cap than VRRCF($16.3M). BKLRF YTD gains are higher at: 29.279 vs. VRRCF (-10.818). VRRCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -870.64K vs. BKLRF (-4.9M). BKLRF has more cash in the bank: 78.9M vs. VRRCF (744K). BKLRF has higher revenues than VRRCF: BKLRF (285K) vs VRRCF (0).
BKLRFVRRCFBKLRF / VRRCF
Capitalization128M16.3M785%
EBITDA-4.9M-870.64K563%
Gain YTD29.279-10.818-271%
P/E Ratio476.19N/A-
Revenue285K0-
Total Cash78.9M744K10,605%
Total Debt0N/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKLRF vs VRRCF: Fundamental Ratings
BKLRF
VRRCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4226
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83100
SMR RATING
1..100
9098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5839
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VRRCF's Valuation (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BKLRF (95). This means that VRRCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BKLRF’s over the last 12 months.

BKLRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as VRRCF (100). This means that BKLRF’s stock grew similarly to VRRCF’s over the last 12 months.

BKLRF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as VRRCF (98). This means that BKLRF’s stock grew similarly to VRRCF’s over the last 12 months.

VRRCF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as BKLRF (58). This means that VRRCF’s stock grew similarly to BKLRF’s over the last 12 months.

BKLRF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for VRRCF (100). This means that BKLRF’s stock grew significantly faster than VRRCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKLRFVRRCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BKLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRRCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FXY60.130.24
+0.40%
Invesco CurrencyShares® Japanese Yen
EAI21.700.07
+0.32%
Entergy Arkansas LLC
IBTG22.81N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Tr ETF
RSPR36.75N/A
N/A
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Wt Real Estt ETF
MART34.03-0.04
-0.11%
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer10 Mar ETF

BKLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKLRF has been loosely correlated with BZDLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BKLRF jumps, then BZDLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKLRF
1D Price
Change %
BKLRF100%
N/A
BZDLF - BKLRF
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VRRCF - BKLRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+32.57%
PJXRF - BKLRF
23%
Poorly correlated
-8.45%
BITTF - BKLRF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCUFF - BKLRF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
More

VRRCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VRRCF and SVMLF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VRRCF and SVMLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRRCF
1D Price
Change %
VRRCF100%
+32.57%
SVMLF - VRRCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.93%
BKLRF - VRRCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DCNNF - VRRCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DWMNF - VRRCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATCUF - VRRCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
More