Ad is loading...
BKLRF
Price
$0.22
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 18 closing price
VRRCF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

BKLRF vs VRRCF

Header iconBKLRF vs VRRCF Comparison
Open Charts BKLRF vs VRRCFBanner chart's image
Berkeley Energy
Price$0.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
CapitalizationN/A
VR Resources
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$270.5K
CapitalizationN/A
BKLRF vs VRRCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKLRF vs. VRRCF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKLRF is a Hold and VRRCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BKLRF: $0.22 vs. VRRCF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: BKLRF and VRRCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKLRF: 45% vs. VRRCF: 252%
Market capitalization -- BKLRF: $127.67M vs. VRRCF: $16.33M
BKLRF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $127.67M. VRRCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $16.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKLRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVRRCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BKLRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VRRCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BKLRF and VRRCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

BKLRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VRRCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -8.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKLRF($128M) has a higher market cap than VRRCF($16.3M). BKLRF YTD gains are higher at: 21.079 vs. VRRCF (-60.000). VRRCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -870.64K vs. BKLRF (-4.9M). BKLRF has more cash in the bank: 78.9M vs. VRRCF (744K). BKLRF has higher revenues than VRRCF: BKLRF (285K) vs VRRCF (0).
BKLRFVRRCFBKLRF / VRRCF
Capitalization128M16.3M785%
EBITDA-4.9M-870.64K563%
Gain YTD21.079-60.000-35%
P/E Ratio476.19N/A-
Revenue285K0-
Total Cash78.9M744K10,605%
Total Debt0N/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKLRF vs VRRCF: Fundamental Ratings
BKLRF
VRRCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
94100
SMR RATING
1..100
8897
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7993
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VRRCF's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BKLRF (96). This means that VRRCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BKLRF’s over the last 12 months.

BKLRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as VRRCF (100). This means that BKLRF’s stock grew similarly to VRRCF’s over the last 12 months.

BKLRF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as VRRCF (97). This means that BKLRF’s stock grew similarly to VRRCF’s over the last 12 months.

BKLRF's Price Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as VRRCF (93). This means that BKLRF’s stock grew similarly to VRRCF’s over the last 12 months.

BKLRF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for VRRCF (100). This means that BKLRF’s stock grew significantly faster than VRRCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GT9.27-0.06
-0.64%
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (The)
ATEN16.44-0.12
-0.72%
A10 Networks
DAIO2.59-0.04
-1.52%
Data I/O Corp
NVR9026.00-153.61
-1.67%
NVR
BMEA6.53-0.58
-8.16%
Biomea Fusion

BKLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKLRF has been loosely correlated with BZDLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BKLRF jumps, then BZDLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKLRF
1D Price
Change %
BKLRF100%
N/A
BZDLF - BKLRF
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KVGOF - BKLRF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VRRCF - BKLRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.76%
PJXRF - BKLRF
23%
Poorly correlated
-14.77%
BITTF - BKLRF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

VRRCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VRRCF and SVMLF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VRRCF and SVMLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRRCF
1D Price
Change %
VRRCF100%
+4.76%
SVMLF - VRRCF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKLRF - VRRCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DCNNF - VRRCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DWMNF - VRRCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATCUF - VRRCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+7.47%
More