Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKMBX vs FASCX
BKMBX vs FASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKMBX vs. FASCX commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKMBX is a Hold and FASCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.76B vs. FASCX (524M). FASCX pays higher dividends than BKMBX: FASCX (5.13) vs BKMBX (4.04). BKMBX was incepted earlier than FASCX: BKMBX (5 years) vs FASCX (12 years). FASCX (3.53) is less costly to investors than BKMBX (0.82). FASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 257.70 vs. BKMBX (242.00). FASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKMBX: FASCX (1000) vs BKMBX (5000000). BKMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.40 vs. FASCX (0.69).
| BKMBX | FASCX | BKMBX / FASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 3.19 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 3.53 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.874 | 2.846 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.76B | 524M | 1,480% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.04 | 5.13 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.40 | 0.69 | 783% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.53 | 9.88 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 3.75 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 5.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement