Ad is loading...
BKMBX vs TFAFX
BKMBX vs TFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKMBX vs. TFAFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKMBX is a Hold and TFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.64B vs. TFAFX (32.3M). BKMBX pays higher dividends than TFAFX: BKMBX (4.05) vs TFAFX (0.00). BKMBX was incepted earlier than TFAFX: BKMBX (5 years) vs TFAFX (6 years). TFAFX (2.90) is less costly to investors than BKMBX (0.82). TFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 288.55 vs. BKMBX (242.00). TFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKMBX: TFAFX (250) vs BKMBX (5000000). BKMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.65 vs. TFAFX (4.05).
| BKMBX | TFAFX | BKMBX / TFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 2.63 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 2.90 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.874 | -6.977 | -41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.64B | 32.3M | 23,641% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.65 | 4.05 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.30 | 17.74 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 13.11 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...