Ad is loading...
BKMBX vs TNMAX
BKMBX vs TNMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKMBX vs. TNMAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKMBX is a Hold and TNMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.51B vs. TNMAX (18.9M). BKMBX pays higher dividends than TNMAX: BKMBX (4.07) vs TNMAX (1.31). BKMBX was incepted earlier than TNMAX: BKMBX (5 years) vs TNMAX (10 years). TNMAX (2.30) is less costly to investors than BKMBX (0.82). BKMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 344.00 vs. TNMAX (34.00). TNMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKMBX: TNMAX (1000) vs BKMBX (5000000). BKMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.25 vs. TNMAX (5.80).
| BKMBX | TNMAX | BKMBX / TNMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.52 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 2.30 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.784 | -0.012 | -14,879% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.51B | 18.9M | 39,714% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.07 | 1.31 | 312% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.25 | 5.80 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.98 | 2.24 | 758% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 10.95 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...