BKRRF
Price
$0.28
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
RMRDF
Price
$0.21
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

BKRRF vs RMRDF

Header iconBKRRF vs RMRDF Comparison
Open Charts BKRRF vs RMRDFBanner chart's image
Blackrock Silver
Price$0.28
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$314.07K
CapitalizationN/A
Radisson Mining Resources
Price$0.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$201.5K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BKRRF vs RMRDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BKRRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
RMRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
BKRRF vs. RMRDF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKRRF is a Buy and RMRDF is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BKRRF: $0.32 vs. RMRDF: $0.22)
Brand notoriety: BKRRF and RMRDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKRRF: 154% vs. RMRDF: 33%
Market capitalization -- BKRRF: $61.77M vs. RMRDF: $46.12M
BKRRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $61.77M. RMRDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $46.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKRRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMRDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BKRRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMRDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BKRRF and RMRDF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKRRF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMRDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BKRRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RMRDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BKRRF is a better buy in the short-term than RMRDF.

Price Growth

BKRRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +13.89% price change this week, while RMRDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.61%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.12% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKRRF($61.8M) has a higher market cap than RMRDF($46.1M). RMRDF YTD gains are higher at: 39.355 vs. BKRRF (32.875). RMRDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.3M vs. BKRRF (-12.36M). BKRRF has more cash in the bank: 3.23M vs. RMRDF (1.8M). BKRRF (0) and RMRDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BKRRFRMRDFBKRRF / RMRDF
Capitalization61.8M46.1M134%
EBITDA-12.36M-2.3M537%
Gain YTD32.87539.35584%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.23M1.8M179%
Total Debt90.2KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKRRF vs RMRDF: Fundamental Ratings
BKRRF
RMRDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7575
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8673
SMR RATING
1..100
9790
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3837
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10089
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BKRRF's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as RMRDF (95). This means that BKRRF’s stock grew similarly to RMRDF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as BKRRF (86). This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to BKRRF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as BKRRF (97). This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to BKRRF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as BKRRF (38). This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to BKRRF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as BKRRF (100). This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to BKRRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKRRFRMRDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BKRRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
RMRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

BKRRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKRRF has been loosely correlated with GATO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BKRRF jumps, then GATO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKRRF
1D Price
Change %
BKRRF100%
+4.66%
GATO - BKRRF
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.80%
AG - BKRRF
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.62%
FSM - BKRRF
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
MAG - BKRRF
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
ASM - BKRRF
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
More

RMRDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMRDF and NSUPF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMRDF and NSUPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMRDF
1D Price
Change %
RMRDF100%
+2.13%
NSUPF - RMRDF
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.64%
IAUX - RMRDF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
DCHRF - RMRDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKRRF - RMRDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.66%
PAAS - RMRDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
More