BL vs EEFT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BL is a StrongBuy and EEFT is a StrongSell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEEFT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- EEFT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EEFT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- EEFT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
BL (@Packaged Software) experienced а +5.42% price change this week, while EEFT (@Packaged Software) price change was +3.29% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.78%.
Reported Earning Dates
BL is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2024.
EEFT is expected to report earnings on Oct 18, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+0.95% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| BL | EEFT | BL / EEFT | |
| Capitalization | 3.99B | 4.97B | 80% |
| EBITDA | 117M | 589M | 20% |
| Gain YTD | -18.658 | -1.655 | 1,127% |
| P/E Ratio | 78.96 | 19.75 | 400% |
| Revenue | 590M | 3.69B | 16% |
| Total Cash | 1.2B | 1.78B | 68% |
| Total Debt | 1.41B | 2.01B | 70% |
BL | EEFT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 98 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 21 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 49 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EEFT's Valuation (64) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as BL (82) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that EEFT’s stock grew similarly to BL’s over the last 12 months.
BL's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as EEFT (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that BL’s stock grew similarly to EEFT’s over the last 12 months.
BL's SMR Rating (21) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as EEFT (43) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that BL’s stock grew similarly to EEFT’s over the last 12 months.
BL's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as EEFT (59) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that BL’s stock grew similarly to EEFT’s over the last 12 months.
EEFT's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BL (99) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that EEFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BL’s over the last 12 months.
| BL | EEFT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 20 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 73% | 10 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 59% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UAE | 15.19 | 0.10 | +0.66% |
| iShares MSCI UAE ETF | |||
| LSAT | 40.51 | 0.25 | +0.62% |
| LeaderShares® AlphaFctr® Tctcl Fcsd ETF | |||
| FDWM | 22.86 | 0.05 | +0.22% |
| Fidelity Women's Leadership ETF | |||
| EEMA | 72.39 | -0.09 | -0.12% |
| iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF | |||
| DFGR | 28.92 | -0.22 | -0.74% |
| Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF | |||
EEFT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEFT has been loosely correlated with SSNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEFT jumps, then SSNC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEFT | 100% | +1.24% | ||
| SSNC - EEFT | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| CLSK - EEFT | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| BL - EEFT | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.46% | ||
| ALRM - EEFT | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| ACIW - EEFT | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
More | ||||