It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSSNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSNC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BL (@Packaged Software) experienced а +11.90% price change this week, while SSNC (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.70% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.05%.
BL is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.
SSNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
BL | SSNC | BL / SSNC | |
Capitalization | 3.99B | 15.7B | 25% |
EBITDA | 117M | 2B | 6% |
Gain YTD | -12.837 | 2.836 | -453% |
P/E Ratio | 78.96 | 26.58 | 297% |
Revenue | 590M | 5.5B | 11% |
Total Cash | 1.2B | 432M | 279% |
Total Debt | 1.41B | 6.92B | 20% |
BL | SSNC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 43 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 50 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 38 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SSNC's Valuation (15) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for BL (82) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that SSNC’s stock grew significantly faster than BL’s over the last 12 months.
SSNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BL (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that SSNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BL’s over the last 12 months.
BL's SMR Rating (22) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SSNC (62) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that BL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SSNC’s over the last 12 months.
SSNC's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as BL (57) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that SSNC’s stock grew similarly to BL’s over the last 12 months.
SSNC's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BL (96) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that SSNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BL’s over the last 12 months.
BL | SSNC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago58% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago44% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago62% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago65% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago57% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago53% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 4 days ago56% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 2 days ago52% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago85% | 3 days ago62% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago51% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
KBE | 52.91 | 1.03 | +1.99% |
SPDR® S&P Bank ETF | |||
MSTB | 34.37 | 0.12 | +0.35% |
LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF | |||
EWQ | 41.32 | N/A | N/A |
iShares MSCI France ETF | |||
TVC | 23.59 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
Tennessee Valley Authority Power Bonds 1998 Series D due June 1 2028 | |||
XHYF | 37.13 | -0.04 | -0.11% |
BondBloxx US Hg Yld Fncl & REIT Str ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BL has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BL jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.