BLAC
Price
$11.26
Change
-$0.06 (-0.53%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
EMCG
Price
$11.61
Change
+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Updated
Dec 18, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

BLAC vs EMCG

Header iconBLAC vs EMCG Comparison
Open Charts BLAC vs EMCGBanner chart's image
Bellevue Life Sciences Acquisition
Price$11.26
Change-$0.06 (-0.53%)
Volume$238
CapitalizationN/A
Embrace Change Acquisition
Price$11.61
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Volume$180
CapitalizationN/A
BLAC vs EMCG Comparison Chart
Loading...
BLAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EMCG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLAC vs. EMCG commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLAC is a Buy and EMCG is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BLAC: $11.26 vs. EMCG: $11.60)
Brand notoriety: BLAC and EMCG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLAC: 1% vs. EMCG: 5%
Market capitalization -- BLAC: $96.53M vs. EMCG: $82.69M
BLAC [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $96.53M. EMCG’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $82.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEMCG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BLAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EMCG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLAC is a better buy in the long-term than EMCG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLAC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EMCG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • EMCG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLAC is a better buy in the short-term than EMCG.

Price Growth

BLAC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while EMCG (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLAC is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.

EMCG is expected to report earnings on Mar 07, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.21% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLAC($96.5M) has a higher market cap than EMCG($82.7M). BLAC has higher P/E ratio than EMCG: BLAC (203.29) vs EMCG (37.13). BLAC YTD gains are higher at: 7.238 vs. EMCG (5.936). EMCG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -603.1K vs. BLAC (-983.06K). EMCG has more cash in the bank: 287K vs. BLAC (58K). BLAC (0) and EMCG (0) have equivalent revenues.
BLACEMCGBLAC / EMCG
Capitalization96.5M82.7M117%
EBITDA-983.06K-603.1K163%
Gain YTD7.2385.936122%
P/E Ratio203.2937.13547%
Revenue00-
Total Cash58K287K20%
Total Debt200KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMCG: Fundamental Ratings
EMCG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
38
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
72
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
64

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLACEMCG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
4%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
53%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
5%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BLAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EMCG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALMCX7.87N/A
N/A
Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth C
PQCCX9.97N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Index R6
OMSOX27.54-0.17
-0.61%
Invesco Main Street All Cap A
WMGYX28.70-0.23
-0.80%
Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Y
IVITX22.63-0.24
-1.05%
VY® Invesco Growth and Income S2

BLAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLAC and MCAAU have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLAC and MCAAU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLAC
1D Price
Change %
BLAC100%
N/A
MCAAU - BLAC
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPXX - BLAC
29%
Poorly correlated
-12.42%
BLACU - BLAC
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRLHU - BLAC
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FLDDU - BLAC
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

EMCG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMCG has been loosely correlated with PRLH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMCG jumps, then PRLH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMCG
1D Price
Change %
EMCG100%
N/A
PRLH - EMCG
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.15%
MSSAU - EMCG
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PLAO - EMCG
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCAA - EMCG
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLAC - EMCG
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More