It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEMCG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLAC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EMCG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
BLAC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while EMCG (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.94%.
BLAC is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.
EMCG is expected to report earnings on Mar 07, 2023.
Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
BLAC | EMCG | BLAC / EMCG | |
Capitalization | 96.5M | 82.7M | 117% |
EBITDA | -983.06K | -603.1K | 163% |
Gain YTD | 7.238 | 5.936 | 122% |
P/E Ratio | 203.29 | 37.13 | 547% |
Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 58K | 287K | 20% |
Total Debt | 200K | N/A | - |
EMCG | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 64 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BLAC | EMCG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago6% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago35% | 2 days ago47% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago40% | 2 days ago13% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago4% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago36% | 2 days ago30% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago32% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago53% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago5% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago36% | 2 days ago35% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
ALMCX | 7.87 | N/A | N/A |
Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth C | |||
PQCCX | 9.97 | N/A | N/A |
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Index R6 | |||
OMSOX | 27.54 | -0.17 | -0.61% |
Invesco Main Street All Cap A | |||
WMGYX | 28.70 | -0.23 | -0.80% |
Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Y | |||
IVITX | 22.63 | -0.24 | -1.05% |
VY® Invesco Growth and Income S2 |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BLAC and MCAAU have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLAC and MCAAU's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BLAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BLAC | 100% | N/A | ||
MCAAU - BLAC | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
IPXX - BLAC | 29% Poorly correlated | -12.42% | ||
BLACU - BLAC | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PRLHU - BLAC | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
FLDDU - BLAC | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMCG has been loosely correlated with PRLH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMCG jumps, then PRLH could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EMCG | 100% | N/A | ||
PRLH - EMCG | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
MSSAU - EMCG | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
PLAO - EMCG | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MCAA - EMCG | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BLAC - EMCG | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |