BLAC
Price
$11.66
Change
+$0.35 (+3.09%)
Updated
Jan 24 closing price
Capitalization
96.53M
GDST
Price
$11.39
Change
+$0.15 (+1.33%)
Updated
Jan 24 closing price
Capitalization
75.33M
Ad is loading...

BLAC vs GDST

Header iconBLAC vs GDST Comparison
Open Charts BLAC vs GDSTBanner chart's image
Bellevue Life Sciences Acquisition
Price$11.66
Change+$0.35 (+3.09%)
Volume$29.69K
Capitalization96.53M
Goldenstone Acquisition
Price$11.39
Change+$0.15 (+1.33%)
Volume$3.16K
Capitalization75.33M
BLAC vs GDST Comparison Chart
Loading...
BLAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GDST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLAC vs. GDST commentary
Jan 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLAC is a Hold and GDST is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BLAC: $11.66 vs. GDST: $11.39)
Brand notoriety: BLAC and GDST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLAC: 288% vs. GDST: 613%
Market capitalization -- BLAC: $96.53M vs. GDST: $75.33M
BLAC [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $96.53M. GDST’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $75.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGDST’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BLAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GDST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLAC is a better buy in the long-term than GDST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLAC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GDST’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • GDST’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLAC is a better buy in the short-term than GDST.

Price Growth

BLAC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +2.73% price change this week, while GDST (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +1.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLAC is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.

GDST is expected to report earnings on Feb 21, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+1.80% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLAC($96.5M) has a higher market cap than GDST($75.3M). BLAC has higher P/E ratio than GDST: BLAC (203.29) vs GDST (62.08). BLAC YTD gains are higher at: 1.127 vs. GDST (0.886). BLAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -983.06K vs. GDST (-1.15M). BLAC has more cash in the bank: 58K vs. GDST (6.12K). BLAC has less debt than GDST: BLAC (200K) vs GDST (1.47M). BLAC (0) and GDST (0) have equivalent revenues.
BLACGDSTBLAC / GDST
Capitalization96.5M75.3M128%
EBITDA-983.06K-1.15M85%
Gain YTD1.1270.886127%
P/E Ratio203.2962.08327%
Revenue00-
Total Cash58K6.12K948%
Total Debt200K1.47M14%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLACGDST
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
47%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
4%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
6%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
1%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
53%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BLAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GDST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NMMEX15.120.08
+0.53%
Northern Active M Emerging Market Equity
DCXAX9.280.03
+0.32%
Catalyst/Millburn Dynamic Cmdty Stgy A
VARBX10.59N/A
N/A
First Trust Merger Arbitrage Cl I
MDGCX25.40-0.05
-0.20%
BlackRock Advantage Global Investor A
TMCPX56.99-0.18
-0.31%
Touchstone Mid Cap Y

BLAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLAC and IPXX have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLAC and IPXX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLAC
1D Price
Change %
BLAC100%
+3.09%
IPXX - BLAC
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TETEU - BLAC
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRLHU - BLAC
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMCG - BLAC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GDST - BLAC
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
More

GDST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GDST and YOTA have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GDST and YOTA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDST
1D Price
Change %
GDST100%
+1.33%
YOTA - GDST
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.82%
ZAPP - GDST
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
GATEU - GDST
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLMJU - GDST
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.35%
BLAC - GDST
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.09%
More