BLD vs FCUS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLD is a Sell and FCUS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- BLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BLD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BLD (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -0.54% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +3.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
BLD is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (+3.98% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
BLD | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BLD | FCUS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 74% | 8 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JEPI | 59.91 | 0.43 | +0.72% |
| JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | |||
| NUHY | 21.42 | 0.01 | +0.07% |
| Nuveen ESG High Yield Corporate Bd ETF | |||
| YEAR | 50.57 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| AB Ultra Short Income ETF | |||
| BSJS | 21.96 | -0.02 | -0.09% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2028 HY Corp Bd ETF | |||
| AAA | 25.10 | -0.06 | -0.24% |
| Alternative AccessFirstPriorityCLO BdETF | |||
BLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLD has been loosely correlated with ACA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLD jumps, then ACA could also see price increases.
FCUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCUS has been closely correlated with VRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCUS jumps, then VRT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCUS | 100% | +1.10% | ||
| VRT - FCUS | 73% Closely correlated | +2.87% | ||
| FIX - FCUS | 68% Closely correlated | +2.88% | ||
| EME - FCUS | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.16% | ||
| BLD - FCUS | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.89% | ||
| IBP - FCUS | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.30% | ||
More | ||||