BLFY
Price
$10.71
Change
-$0.12 (-1.11%)
Updated
Dec 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
40 days until earnings call
FFBC
Price
$28.83
Change
-$0.14 (-0.48%)
Updated
Dec 13, 11:11 AM (EDT)
41 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BLFY vs FFBC

Header iconBLFY vs FFBC Comparison
Open Charts BLFY vs FFBCBanner chart's image
Blue Foundry Ban
Price$10.71
Change-$0.12 (-1.11%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
First Financial Ban
Price$28.83
Change-$0.14 (-0.48%)
Volume$844
CapitalizationN/A
BLFY vs FFBC Comparison Chart
Loading...
BLFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLFY vs. FFBC commentary
Dec 13, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLFY is a Hold and FFBC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2024
Stock price -- (BLFY: $10.70 vs. FFBC: $28.97)
Brand notoriety: BLFY and FFBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLFY: 57% vs. FFBC: 87%
Market capitalization -- BLFY: $227.8M vs. FFBC: $2.08B
BLFY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $227.8M. FFBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFFBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the long-term than BLFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLFY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFBC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLFY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FFBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLFY is a better buy in the short-term than FFBC.

Price Growth

BLFY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.56% price change this week, while FFBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLFY is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBC($2.08B) has a higher market cap than BLFY($228M). BLFY has higher P/E ratio than FFBC: BLFY (500.00) vs FFBC (8.15). FFBC YTD gains are higher at: 26.740 vs. BLFY (10.651). BLFY has less debt than FFBC: BLFY (424M) vs FFBC (1.28B). FFBC has higher revenues than BLFY: FFBC (840M) vs BLFY (43.7M).
BLFYFFBCBLFY / FFBC
Capitalization228M2.08B11%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.65126.74040%
P/E Ratio500.008.156,136%
Revenue43.7M840M5%
Total CashN/A213M-
Total Debt424M1.28B33%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBC: Fundamental Ratings
FFBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
61
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
39
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
22
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLFYFFBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BLFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UBPIX14.19N/A
N/A
ProFunds UltraLatin America Inv
CAMUX25.04-0.12
-0.48%
Cambiar SMID Institutional
FMUCX15.01-0.08
-0.53%
Federated Hermes Muni and Stock Adv C
PMYAX44.15-0.28
-0.63%
Putnam Core Equity Fund A
NSNCX51.21-0.59
-1.14%
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth C

BLFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLFY has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLFY jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLFY
1D Price
Change %
BLFY100%
-1.29%
UBSI - BLFY
79%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
SFNC - BLFY
78%
Closely correlated
-1.03%
QCRH - BLFY
78%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
FCBC - BLFY
78%
Closely correlated
-1.22%
FFBC - BLFY
77%
Closely correlated
-1.16%
More

FFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBC
1D Price
Change %
FFBC100%
-1.16%
UBSI - FFBC
92%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
BUSE - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
-1.60%
UCB - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
-2.06%
FRME - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
-1.03%
CBU - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
-1.84%
More