BLFY
Price
$9.41
Change
+$0.04 (+0.43%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
227.8M
4 days until earnings call
TMP
Price
$66.95
Change
+$0.31 (+0.47%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
704.46M
6 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BLFY vs TMP

Header iconBLFY vs TMP Comparison
Open Charts BLFY vs TMPBanner chart's image
Blue Foundry Ban
Price$9.41
Change+$0.04 (+0.43%)
Volume$36.5K
Capitalization227.8M
Tompkins Financial
Price$66.95
Change+$0.31 (+0.47%)
Volume$50.94K
Capitalization704.46M
BLFY vs TMP Comparison Chart
Loading...
BLFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLFY vs. TMP commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLFY is a Hold and TMP is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BLFY: $9.41 vs. TMP: $66.95)
Brand notoriety: BLFY and TMP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLFY: 74% vs. TMP: 92%
Market capitalization -- BLFY: $227.8M vs. TMP: $704.46M
BLFY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $227.8M. TMP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $704.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTMP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TMP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TMP is a better buy in the long-term than BLFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLFY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMP’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLFY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TMP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TMP is a better buy in the short-term than BLFY.

Price Growth

BLFY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.09% price change this week, while TMP (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLFY is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

TMP is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMP($704M) has a higher market cap than BLFY($228M). BLFY has higher P/E ratio than TMP: BLFY (500.00) vs TMP (74.09). TMP YTD gains are higher at: -1.297 vs. BLFY (-4.077). BLFY has less debt than TMP: BLFY (424M) vs TMP (602M). TMP has higher revenues than BLFY: TMP (216M) vs BLFY (43.7M).
BLFYTMPBLFY / TMP
Capitalization228M704M32%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.077-1.297314%
P/E Ratio500.0074.09675%
Revenue43.7M216M20%
Total CashN/A75.4M-
Total Debt424M602M70%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TMP: Fundamental Ratings
TMP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
68
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
19
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLFYTMP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
48%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BLFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACVIX10.950.08
+0.74%
American Century Small Cap Value I
DHIAX17.160.02
+0.12%
Diamond Hill International Inv
BIGIX27.560.02
+0.07%
William Blair International Growth I
VKSDX10.67N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Value A
GSRAX11.43N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Gr A

BLFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLFY has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLFY jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLFY
1D Price
Change %
BLFY100%
+0.43%
UBSI - BLFY
79%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
SFNC - BLFY
78%
Closely correlated
+1.56%
QCRH - BLFY
78%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
TMP - BLFY
78%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
FCBC - BLFY
77%
Closely correlated
+2.49%
More

TMP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMP has been closely correlated with CBU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TMP jumps, then CBU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMP
1D Price
Change %
TMP100%
+0.47%
CBU - TMP
88%
Closely correlated
+1.05%
FFBC - TMP
87%
Closely correlated
+1.45%
NWBI - TMP
87%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
UBSI - TMP
86%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
FCBC - TMP
85%
Closely correlated
+2.49%
More