BLMN
Price
$8.24
Change
-$0.09 (-1.08%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
705.89M
31 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
JACK
Price
$11.58
Change
+$0.17 (+1.49%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
220.78M
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLMN vs JACK

BLMN vs JACK Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLMN vs. JACK commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLMN is a Buy and JACK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (BLMN: $8.33 vs. JACK: $11.41)
Brand notoriety: BLMN and JACK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLMN: 106% vs. JACK: 109%
Market capitalization -- BLMN: $713.17M vs. JACK: $217.63M
BLMN [@Restaurants] is valued at $713.17M. JACK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $217.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $191.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $10.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLMN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJACK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLMN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • JACK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLMN is a better buy in the long-term than JACK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLMN’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JACK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLMN’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • JACK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLMN is a better buy in the short-term than JACK.

Price Growth

BLMN (@Restaurants) experienced а +8.89% price change this week, while JACK (@Restaurants) price change was -11.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -3.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLMN is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.

JACK is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-3.48% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLMN($706M) has a higher market cap than JACK($221M). BLMN has higher P/E ratio than JACK: BLMN (34.71) vs JACK (9.34). BLMN YTD gains are higher at: 35.008 vs. JACK (-39.789). BLMN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 219M vs. JACK (3.81M). BLMN has more cash in the bank: 71.3M vs. JACK (43M). BLMN has less debt than JACK: BLMN (1.97B) vs JACK (2.61B). BLMN has higher revenues than JACK: BLMN (3.97B) vs JACK (1.43B).
BLMNJACKBLMN / JACK
Capitalization706M221M319%
EBITDA219M3.81M5,750%
Gain YTD35.008-39.789-88%
P/E Ratio34.719.34372%
Revenue3.97B1.43B277%
Total Cash71.3M43M166%
Total Debt1.97B2.61B76%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLMN vs JACK: Fundamental Ratings
BLMN
JACK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2821
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
841
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4557
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
580
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JACK's Valuation (15) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BLMN (19). This means that JACK’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

JACK's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BLMN (100). This means that JACK’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

JACK's SMR Rating (1) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for BLMN (84). This means that JACK’s stock grew significantly faster than BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

BLMN's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as JACK (57). This means that BLMN’s stock grew similarly to JACK’s over the last 12 months.

BLMN's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for JACK (80). This means that BLMN’s stock grew significantly faster than JACK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLMNJACK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLMN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
JACK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LPEFX5.29N/A
N/A
ALPS Global Opportunity Inv
LCEYX19.35N/A
N/A
Invesco Diversified Dividend Y
FSCEX19.79N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap C
MLCPX9.49N/A
N/A
MainGate MLP C
NMVLX13.22N/A
N/A
Nuance Mid Cap Value Institutional

BLMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLMN has been loosely correlated with DIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLMN jumps, then DIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLMN
1D Price
Change %
BLMN100%
+3.35%
DIN - BLMN
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.28%
FRSH - BLMN
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
TXRH - BLMN
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
BJRI - BLMN
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
CBRL - BLMN
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.57%
More

JACK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JACK has been loosely correlated with WEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JACK jumps, then WEN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JACK
1D Price
Change %
JACK100%
-10.86%
WEN - JACK
39%
Loosely correlated
-9.26%
DIN - JACK
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.28%
BJRI - JACK
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
CBRL - JACK
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.57%
BLMN - JACK
37%
Loosely correlated
+3.35%
More