BLMN
Price
$8.47
Change
+$0.30 (+3.67%)
Updated
Oct 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
677.26M
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
DIN
Price
$29.49
Change
+$0.53 (+1.83%)
Updated
Oct 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
365.22M
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLMN vs DIN

BLMN vs DIN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLMN vs. DIN commentary
Oct 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLMN is a Buy and DIN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLMN vs DIN: Fundamental Ratings
BLMN
DIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
378
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
80100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4756
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a24

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (17) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BLMN (22). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BLMN (100). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

BLMN's SMR Rating (80) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (100). This means that BLMN’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

BLMN's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (56). This means that BLMN’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BLMN (5). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLMNDIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 09, 2026
Stock price -- (BLMN: $8.17 vs. DIN: $28.96)
Brand notoriety: BLMN and DIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLMN: 60% vs. DIN: 158%
Market capitalization -- BLMN: $677.26M vs. DIN: $365.22M
BLMN [@Restaurants] is valued at $677.26M. DIN’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $365.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $1.6K to $165.31B. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $9.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLMN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while DIN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLMN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLMN is a better buy in the long-term than DIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLMN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLMN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • DIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BLMN and DIN are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BLMN (@Restaurants) experienced а +5.42% price change this week, while DIN (@Restaurants) price change was +4.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLMN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

DIN is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.87% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

View a ticker or compare two or three
BLMN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PBJL32.12-0.03
-0.11%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - July (PBJL)
HAUZ20.81-0.09
-0.43%
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ)
IBMX23.35-0.11
-0.47%
iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMX)
VYM157.45-0.92
-0.58%
Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VYM)
ASTX10.08-0.84
-7.69%
Tradr 2X Long ASTS Daily ETF (ASTX)

BLMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLMN has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLMN jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLMN
1D Price
Change %
BLMN100%
-1.98%
FRSH - BLMN
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
DRI - BLMN
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
DIN - BLMN
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.90%
TXRH - BLMN
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
BJRI - BLMN
45%
Loosely correlated
-3.28%
More

DIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIN has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DIN jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIN
1D Price
Change %
DIN100%
-1.90%
FRSH - DIN
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
DRI - DIN
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
FWRG - DIN
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
BLMN - DIN
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.98%
EAT - DIN
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.69%
More