BLMN
Price
$7.33
Change
+$0.07 (+0.96%)
Updated
May 8 closing price
Capitalization
616.6M
77 days until earnings call
TXRH
Price
$172.59
Change
+$1.33 (+0.78%)
Updated
May 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.46B
Earnings call today
Ad is loading...

BLMN vs TXRH

Header iconBLMN vs TXRH Comparison
Open Charts BLMN vs TXRHBanner chart's image
Bloomin' Brands
Price$7.33
Change+$0.07 (+0.96%)
Volume$4.53M
Capitalization616.6M
Texas Roadhouse
Price$172.59
Change+$1.33 (+0.78%)
Volume$10.66K
Capitalization11.46B
BLMN vs TXRH Comparison Chart
Loading...
BLMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TXRH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLMN vs. TXRH commentary
May 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLMN is a Buy and TXRH is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 09, 2025
Stock price -- (BLMN: $7.33 vs. TXRH: $172.55)
Brand notoriety: BLMN and TXRH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLMN: 149% vs. TXRH: 102%
Market capitalization -- BLMN: $616.6M vs. TXRH: $11.46B
BLMN [@Restaurants] is valued at $616.6M. TXRH’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $11.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $224.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLMN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTXRH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLMN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TXRH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BLMN and TXRH are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLMN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TXRH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLMN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TXRH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TXRH is a better buy in the short-term than BLMN.

Price Growth

BLMN (@Restaurants) experienced а -8.38% price change this week, while TXRH (@Restaurants) price change was +3.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +3.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLMN is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.

TXRH is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+3.73% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TXRH($11.5B) has a higher market cap than BLMN($617M). BLMN has higher P/E ratio than TXRH: BLMN (52.24) vs TXRH (26.47). TXRH YTD gains are higher at: -4.705 vs. BLMN (-38.988). TXRH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 696M vs. BLMN (179M). TXRH has less debt than BLMN: TXRH (854M) vs BLMN (2.28B). TXRH has higher revenues than BLMN: TXRH (5.37B) vs BLMN (3.95B).
BLMNTXRHBLMN / TXRH
Capitalization617M11.5B5%
EBITDA179M696M26%
Gain YTD-38.988-4.705829%
P/E Ratio52.2426.47197%
Revenue3.95B5.37B74%
Total Cash70.1MN/A-
Total Debt2.28B854M266%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLMN vs TXRH: Fundamental Ratings
BLMN
TXRH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5922
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10010
SMR RATING
1..100
9328
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6554
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
274
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLMN's Valuation (4) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TXRH (69). This means that BLMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than TXRH’s over the last 12 months.

TXRH's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for BLMN (100). This means that TXRH’s stock grew significantly faster than BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

TXRH's SMR Rating (28) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLMN (93). This means that TXRH’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

TXRH's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BLMN (65). This means that TXRH’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

BLMN's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for TXRH (74). This means that BLMN’s stock grew significantly faster than TXRH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLMNTXRH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BLMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TXRH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QUAL170.970.94
+0.55%
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
GSEW75.790.34
+0.45%
Goldman Sachs Equal Wght US Lg Cp Eq ETF
DIAL17.830.03
+0.19%
Columbia Diversified Fixed Inc Allc ETF
SVAL29.10-0.05
-0.17%
iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF
MOOD31.51-0.08
-0.25%
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allc ETF

BLMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLMN has been loosely correlated with DIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLMN jumps, then DIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLMN
1D Price
Change %
BLMN100%
+0.96%
DIN - BLMN
64%
Loosely correlated
+10.75%
CBRL - BLMN
59%
Loosely correlated
+6.65%
CAKE - BLMN
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
BJRI - BLMN
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.55%
DRI - BLMN
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
More

TXRH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TXRH has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TXRH jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TXRH
1D Price
Change %
TXRH100%
+0.01%
CAKE - TXRH
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
DRI - TXRH
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
EAT - TXRH
57%
Loosely correlated
+3.67%
BJRI - TXRH
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
KRUS - TXRH
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
More