BLUA vs CNDA
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLUA is a StrongBuy and CNDA is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLUA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCNDA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BLUA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CNDA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
BLUA (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CNDA (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.07%.
Reported Earning Dates
BLUA is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.
CNDA is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (-0.15% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| BLUA | CNDA | BLUA / CNDA | |
| Capitalization | 104M | 228M | 46% |
| EBITDA | -7.51M | -2.31M | 325% |
| Gain YTD | 3.377 | 1.975 | 171% |
| P/E Ratio | 63.29 | 45.70 | 139% |
| Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 39.6K | 363K | 11% |
| Total Debt | 822K | N/A | - |
CNDA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 22 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
BLUA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLUA has been closely correlated with CNDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLUA jumps, then CNDA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BLUA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLUA | 100% | -0.27% | ||
| CNDA - BLUA | 80% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| NSTD - BLUA | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| GAMC - BLUA | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.54% | ||
| FRLA - BLUA | 41% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BLEU - BLUA | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.75% | ||
More | ||||
CNDA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNDA has been closely correlated with BLUA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNDA jumps, then BLUA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNDA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNDA | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| BLUA - CNDA | 88% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| HUDAU - CNDA | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PPHP - CNDA | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ACACU - CNDA | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HCVI - CNDA | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
More | ||||