Ad is loading...
BLUEX vs NLSIX
BLUEX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts BLUEX vs NLSIX
AMG Veritas Global Real Return I
Price$39.63
Change+$0.25 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.08M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$18.85
Change+$0.18 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.13B
BLUEX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLUEX vs. NLSIX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLUEX is a Buy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.13B vs. BLUEX (100M). BLUEX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: BLUEX (0.28) vs NLSIX (0.02). BLUEX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: BLUEX (34 years) vs NLSIX (13 years). NLSIX (1.32) is less costly to investors than BLUEX (1.24). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. BLUEX (33.00). BLUEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: BLUEX (2000) vs NLSIX (1000000). BLUEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.96 vs. NLSIX (5.44). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 31.07 vs. BLUEX (-9.08).
| BLUEX | NLSIX | BLUEX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.32 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.32 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.233 | -0.427 | -523% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 100M | 7.13B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.02 | 1,275% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.96 | 5.44 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.63 | 11.78 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.08 | 31.07 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.17 | 42.90 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...