Ad is loading...
BMBCX vs TFAFX
BMBCX vs TFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMBCX vs. TFAFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMBCX is a Hold and TFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMBCX has more cash in the bank: 7.64B vs. TFAFX (32.3M). BMBCX pays higher dividends than TFAFX: BMBCX (3.04) vs TFAFX (0.00). BMBCX was incepted earlier than TFAFX: BMBCX (10 years) vs TFAFX (6 years). TFAFX (2.90) is less costly to investors than BMBCX (1.89). TFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 288.55 vs. BMBCX (242.00). TFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMBCX: TFAFX (250) vs BMBCX (1000). BMBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.59 vs. TFAFX (4.05). BMBCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.24 vs. TFAFX (13.11).
| BMBCX | TFAFX | BMBCX / TFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 2.63 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 2.90 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.398 | -6.977 | -34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.64B | 32.3M | 23,641% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.04 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.59 | 4.05 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.67 | 17.74 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.24 | 13.11 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...