Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMCCX vs RGAHX
BMCCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts BMCCX vs RGAHX
BMCCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMCCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMCCX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. BMCCX (1.98B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than BMCCX: RGAHX (0.40) vs BMCCX (0.00). BMCCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: BMCCX (33 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). BMCCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). BMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 98.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMCCX: RGAHX (250) vs BMCCX (1000). BMCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.09 vs. RGAHX (1.39). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 14.26 vs. BMCCX (7.25).
| BMCCX | RGAHX | BMCCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.44 | 368% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.44 | 436% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.035 | 9.667 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.98B | 353B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.09 | 1.39 | 294% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.06 | 43.18 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.25 | 14.26 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.32 | 104.36 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement